The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science.
Open accessAbstract
Computer science has one of the largest gender disparities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. An important reason for this disparity is that girls are less likely than boys to enroll in necessary “pipeline courses,” such as introductory computer science. Two experiments investigated whether high-school girls’ lower interest than boys in enrolling in computer science courses is influenced by stereotypes of the field. We further tested whether these stereotypes can be communicated by the physical classroom environment, and whether changing this environment alters girls’ interest. In 2 experiments (N = 269), a computer science classroom that did not project current computer science stereotypes caused girls, but not boys, to express more interest in taking computer science than a classroom that made these stereotypes salient. The gender difference was mediated by girls’ lower sense of belonging in the course, even beyond the effects of negative stereotype concerns, expectations of success, and utility value. Girls’ lower sense of belonging could be traced to lower feelings of fit with computer science stereotypes. Individual differences in fit with stereotypes predicted girls’ belonging and interest in a stereotypical, but not a nonstereotypical, classroom. Adolescence is a critical time for career aspirations. Girls may avoid computer science courses because current prevailing stereotypes of the field signal to them that they do not belong. However, providing them with an educational environment that does not fit current computer science stereotypes increases their interest in computer science courses and could provide grounds for interventions to help reduce gender disparities in computer science enrollment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
(2013) · Cited by 44,563
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
Hayes, A. F. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903310360 · Cited by 9,757
A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance
Steele, C. M. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.6.613 · Cited by 6,770
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
The four-phase model of interest development
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4 · Cited by 4,702
Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix
Steiger, J. H. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245 · Cited by 4,621 · cited 2×
“Using Fisher’s r -to- z transformation, we compared the size of the correlations (Steiger, 1980).”
BackgroundMethodExpectancies, values and academic behaviors
Eccles, J. S. (1983) · Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) · Cited by 3,901
Cited by
Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000052 · Cited by 1,259
Self-citationDeveloping a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective
Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654318779957 · Cited by 390
Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls
Master, A., Cheryan, S., Moscatelli, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.013 · Cited by 372
Self-citationThe Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature 2007–2017
Blackburn, H. (2017) · Science & Technology Libraries · doi:10.1080/0194262x.2017.1371658 · Cited by 353
A systematic review on teaching and learning robotics content knowledge in K-12
Xia, L., & Zhong, B. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.007 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 424-437
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2527035325
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 60.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/edu0000061
- The paper
- Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.