Control over spatial representation format enhances information extraction but prevents long-term learning.
Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated that cognitive offloading (i.e., externalizing mental processes) is useful for immediate problem solving. However, long-term effects of cognitive offloading on subsequent problem solving without offloading are remarkably understudied. Our main goal was to investigate the effects of representation control (i.e., adjusting the format of the representation to task requirements) on incidental procedural learning in an information extraction task with interactive visualizations. More specifically, we tested how the availability of representation control for solving tasks in a practice phase affects procedural learning measured in a testing phase in which representation control is no longer available. In both phases, we explored time on task as well as proportion correct as proxies of task performance and analyzed how often participants used representation control. We conducted three experiments in which participants could modify and reorganize information displays in the practice phase, whereas in the testing phase, they had to solve equivalent and near transfer problems without this offloading opportunity. We show that representation control is beneficial for immediate task solution, particularly for problems that require a spatial transformation. This benefit was more pronounced for automated (i.e., system-controlled) types of control (Experiment 3). In contrast, in subsequent problem solving without representation control (up to 24 hr later), participants who had been using representation control previously fell back to the level of an untrained baseline condition (Experiments 1 and 2). However, the detrimental effect of representation control was confined to equivalent tasks and did not generalize to a near transfer task. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
What users learn in this context appears to be how to effectively utilise the offloading device rather than solving the problem with one's own cognitive abilities.
“However, what users learn in this context appears to be how to effectively utilise the offloading device rather than solving the problem at hand with one’s own cognitive abilities (Moritz et al., 2020).”
From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Moritz et al., 2020
Cites
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7 · Cited by 5,457 · see citing works
Paas, F. G. W. C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429 · Cited by 2,150 · see citing works
On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action
Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1 · Cited by 1,641 · see citing works
Learning Versus Performance: An Integrative Review
Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615569000 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W.-T., & Schoelles, M. J. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.461 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
How Navigational Aids Impair Spatial Memory: Evidence for Divided Attention
Gardony, A. L., Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., & Taylor, H. A. (2013) · Spatial Cognition & Computation · doi:10.1080/13875868.2013.792821 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Reducing verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: An undesired desirable difficulty?
Yue, C. L., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031971 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
What do the hands externalize in simple arithmetic?
Carlson, R. A., Avraamides, M. N., Cary, M., & Strasberg, S. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.747 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Navigational Aids and Spatial Memory Impairment: The Role of Divided Attention
Gardony, A. L., Brunyé, T. T., & Taylor, H. A. (2015) · Spatial Cognition & Computation · doi:10.1080/13875868.2015.1059432 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory
Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F., & Meyerhoff, H. S. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218211008060 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“This concern has received empirical support from findings on spatial memory (e.g., Fenech et al., 2010; Gardony et al., 2015), problem solving (Moritz et al., 2018, 2020; O’Hara & Payne, 1998; Van Nimwegen & Van Oostendorp, 2009), as well as the recall of information (Eskritt & Ma, 2014; Kelly &…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationInterface and interaction design: How mobile touch devices foster cognitive offloading
Grinschgl, S., Meyerhoff, H. S., & Papenmeier, F. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106317 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationSun, J., Wang, Y., Hu, Z., Liu, Y., & Sun, Y. (2025) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.12540 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Moritz, J., Meyerhoff, H. S., & Schwan, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 148-165
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2946710285
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Keywords
- cognitive offloading, spatial representation, information extraction, interactive visualization, procedural learning, long-term learning, transfer of learning, spatial transformation, time on task
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review