Cited by 22Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesData Visualization and AnalyticsSpatial Cognition and Navigation

Control over spatial representation format enhances information extraction but prevents long-term learning.

Moritz, Julia, Meyerhoff, Hauke S., Schwan, Stephan·2020·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that cognitive offloading (i.e., externalizing mental processes) is useful for immediate problem solving. However, long-term effects of cognitive offloading on subsequent problem solving without offloading are remarkably understudied. Our main goal was to investigate the effects of representation control (i.e., adjusting the format of the representation to task requirements) on incidental procedural learning in an information extraction task with interactive visualizations. More specifically, we tested how the availability of representation control for solving tasks in a practice phase affects procedural learning measured in a testing phase in which representation control is no longer available. In both phases, we explored time on task as well as proportion correct as proxies of task performance and analyzed how often participants used representation control. We conducted three experiments in which participants could modify and reorganize information displays in the practice phase, whereas in the testing phase, they had to solve equivalent and near transfer problems without this offloading opportunity. We show that representation control is beneficial for immediate task solution, particularly for problems that require a spatial transformation. This benefit was more pronounced for automated (i.e., system-controlled) types of control (Experiment 3). In contrast, in subsequent problem solving without representation control (up to 24 hr later), participants who had been using representation control previously fell back to the level of an untrained baseline condition (Experiments 1 and 2). However, the detrimental effect of representation control was confined to equivalent tasks and did not generalize to a near transfer task. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/edu0000364

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • What users learn in this context appears to be how to effectively utilise the offloading device rather than solving the problem with one's own cognitive abilities.

    “However, what users learn in this context appears to be how to effectively utilise the offloading device rather than solving the problem at hand with one’s own cognitive abilities (Moritz et al., 2020).”

    From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Moritz et al., 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moritz, J., Meyerhoff, H. S., & Schwan, S.
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2020-01
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
148-165
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2946710285
Cited by
22
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Keywords
cognitive offloading, spatial representation, information extraction, interactive visualization, procedural learning, long-term learning, transfer of learning, spatial transformation, time on task

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review