Cited by 82Spatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Navigational Aids and Spatial Memory Impairment: The Role of Divided Attention

Gardony, Aaron L., Brunyé, Tad T., Taylor, Holly A.·2015·Spatial Cognition & Computation

Abstract

Navigational aids impair spatial memory for experienced environments, but the cognitive mechanisms underlying impairment remain an open question. Recent evidence implicates divided attention, but to date no study has directly manipulated divided attention in navigational aid contexts. The present study addresses this need. Participants navigated virtual towns with aid presence and divided attention factorially crossed in a within-participants design. They then completed spatial memory assessments. Divided attention alone impaired spatial memory. Navigational aid presence impaired spatial memory when attention was undivided, replicating previous findings, but did not to a greater extent when attention was divided. These findings suggest that navigational aids divide attention sufficiently to impair spatial memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13875868.2015.1059432

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This result aligns with previous studies showing that guiding attention to the environment and task-relevant landmarks strengthens the encoding of these features and supports spatial memory formations.

    “This result aligns with previous studies, showing that guiding attention to the environment and task-relevant landmarks strengthens the encoding of these features and supports spatial memory formations (Gardony et al., 2013, 2015; Hejtmánek et al., 2018; Willis et al., 2009).”
  • Looking at irrelevant information is associated with poorer spatial knowledge development, whilst engagement with relevant information is better for spatial learning.

    “Put simply, looking at irrelevant information is associated with poorer spatial knowledge development, whilst engagement with relevant information is better for spatial learning (Chrastil & Warren, 2012; Gardony et al., 2013, 2015; Hejtmánek et al., 2018; Willis et al., 2009).”
  • Frequent externalisation of internal cognitive processes leads to an impoverishment of the corresponding internal abilities.

    “a common concern states that frequent externalisation of internal cognitive processes leads to an impoverishment of the corresponding internal abilities. This concern has received empirical support from findings on spatial memory (e.g., Fenech et al., 2010; Gardony et al., 2015), problem solving (Moritz et al., 2018, 2020; O’Hara & Payne, 1998; Van Nimwegen & Van Oostendorp, 2009), as well as the”

    From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Gardony et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 99 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardony, A. L., Brunyé, T. T., & Taylor, H. A.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Gardony, Aaron L.
Venue
Spatial Cognition & Computation
Published
2015-06-19
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
246-284
ISSN
  • 1387-5868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-7633
OpenAlex
W2285654526
Cited by
82
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Spatial Cognition and Computation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
navigation aids, spatial memory, divided attention, wayfinding, cognitive impairment, attentional load

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review