Cited by 5Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Outcomes of a 6-week cognitive–behavioral and mindfulness group intervention in primary care.

Craner, Julia R., Sawchuk, Craig N., Smyth, Kileen T.·2016·Families, Systems, & Health

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness-based interventions are established treatments for depressive and anxiety disorders; however, there is a lack of research for these interventions in primary care settings. The current study evaluates an evidence-based group intervention provided to primary care patients with a variety of mood and anxiety concerns. METHOD: Participants included 54 adult primary care patients who attended at least four sessions of a six-session cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness group. A total of nine separate groups were conducted, all of which were colocated within the primary care setting. Major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder were the most common psychiatric conditions, with approximately 56% of the sample having one or more chronic medical conditions. Self-report measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7) were completed at each session. RESULTS: Significant improvements were noted on self-reported measures of depression and anxiety when comparing pre- and posttreatment assessment measures with large effect sizes. DISCUSSION: A brief, principle-based cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness group intervention delivered in primary care was associated with improved symptoms across a range of patient presentations. Evidence-based group interventions in primary care settings have the benefits of increased access and cost-effectiveness. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/fsh0000202

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craner, J. R., Sawchuk, C. N., & Smyth, K. T.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Families, Systems, & Health
Published
2016
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
250-259
ISSN
  • 1091-7527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0602
OpenAlex
W2466150599
Cited by
5
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Families Systems & Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based interventions, group therapy, primary care, depression, anxiety, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, brief psychotherapy, chronic disease, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Teaching, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Self Report, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review