Cited by 152Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCancer survivorship and care

The efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions in primary care: a meta-analytic review.

Open access
Demarzo, M. M. P., Montero-Marin, J., Cuijpers, P., Zabaleta-del-Olmo, E., Mahtani, K. R., Vellinga, A., Vicens, C., Lopez-del-Hoyo, Y. +1 more·2015·The Annals of Family Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: Positive effects have been reported after mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) in diverse clinical and nonclinical populations. Primary care is a key health care setting for addressing common chronic conditions, and an effective MBI designed for this setting could benefit countless people worldwide. Meta-analyses of MBIs have become popular, but little is known about their efficacy in primary care. Our aim was to investigate the application and efficacy of MBIs that address primary care patients. METHODS: We performed a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials addressing the effect of MBIs in adult patients recruited from primary care settings. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and Cochrane guidelines were followed. Effect sizes were calculated with the Hedges g in random effects models. RESULTS: The meta-analyses were based on 6 trials having a total of 553 patients. The overall effect size of MBI compared with a control condition for improving general health was moderate (g = 0.48; P = .002), with moderate heterogeneity (I(2) = 59; P <.05). We found no indication of publication bias in the overall estimates. MBIs were efficacious for improving mental health (g = 0.56; P = .007), with a high heterogeneity (I(2) = 78; P <.01), and for improving quality of life (g = 0.29; P = .002), with a low heterogeneity (I(2) = 0; P >.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of randomized controlled trials applying MBIs in primary care is still limited, our results suggest that these interventions are promising for the mental health and quality of life of primary care patients. We discuss innovative approaches for implementing MBIs, such as complex intervention and stepped care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1370/afm.1863

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. García Campayo J. [The practice of "being attentive" (mindfulness) in medicine. Impact on patients and professionals]. Aten Primaria. 2008;40(7):363-366.
  2. Demarzo MMP. [Meditation applied to health]. In: [Updating Pro- gram in Family and Community Medicine]. 6th ed. Porto Alegre, Bra- zil: Artmed Panamericana; 2011:1-18.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Demarzo, M. M. P., Montero-Marin, J., Cuijpers, P., Zabaleta-del-Olmo, E., Mahtani, K. R., Vellinga, A., Vicens, C., Lopez-del-Hoyo, Y., & Garcia-Campayo, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
  • Red de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud (ES)
Venue
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2015-11-01
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
573-582
ISSN
  • 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-1717
OpenAlex
W2192018121
Cited by
152
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Docusalut (Conselleria de Salut i Consum del Govern de les Illes Balears) (submittedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2011-13-006)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, primary care, mental health, quality of life, health status, stepped care, complex interventions, chronic disease, intervention efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review