The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Choice reaction time: An analysis of the major theoretical positions.
Abstract
The report analyzes and evaluates (against experimental findings) contemporary theories of choice reaction time (CRT). The influence of Donders' subtraction method on current theory is assessed, followed by a review of experimental findings concerned with the effects on CRT of: (1) number of alternatives, (2) stimulus probability, (3) stimulus value, (4) repetition of stimulus or response, (5) stimulus discriminability, (6) stimulus-response compatibility, (7) practice, and (8) emphasis on speed versus accuracy. A three-state conceptualization of the central mechanisms operative during the latent period--stimulus preprocessing, stimulus categorization, and response selection--is proposed. The theories are dichotomized on the basis of the process-template matching versus feature testing--which is assumed to underlie stimulus categorization. The analysis indicates that current theories have neglected response selection processes and are consequently unable to account for several experimental findings. A final section deals with the relation of CRT theories to perceptual recognition theories. (Author)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.
Hyman, R. (1953) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0056940 · Cited by 1,443
S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.
Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0062827 · Cited by 1,088
S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.
Fitts, P. M., & Deininger, R. L. (1954) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054967 · Cited by 469
Cited by
Cognitive representations of semantic categories.
Rosch, E. H. (1975) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.104.3.192 · Cited by 4,756
The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method
Sternberg, S. (1969) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9 · Cited by 3,137
Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time
Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.887923 · Cited by 1,714
Towards a model of stress and human performance
Sanders, A. F. (1983) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(83)90016-1 · Cited by 878
A Common Coding Approach to Perception and Action
Prinz, W. (1990) · Relationships Between Perception and Action · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75348-0_7 · Cited by 751
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, E. E.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1968
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 77-110
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2056622185
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Choice reaction time: An analysis of the major theoretical positions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0020189
- The paper
- Smith, E. E. (1968). Choice reaction time: An analysis of the major theoretical positions. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.