The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual differences in the resolution of response uncertainty.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.
Hyman, R. (1953) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0056940 · Cited by 1,443
Cited by
The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health
Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., & Daily, G. C. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x · Cited by 1,275
Cognitive Styles—an overview and integration
Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/0144341910110301 · Cited by 1,181
Modulation of Emotional Appraisal by False Physiological Feedback during fMRI
Gray, M. A., Harrison, N. A., Wiens, S., & Critchley, H. D. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000546 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Kagan, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1965-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 154-160
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1968979246
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual differences in the resolution of response uncertainty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0022199
- The paper
- Kagan, J. (1965). Individual differences in the resolution of response uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
