Cited by 41Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and AssessmentSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Thurstone's measurement of social values revisited forty years later.

Coombs, Clyde H.·1967·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0024522

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the survey was repeated in 1966 and 1976, respondents viewed rape as slightly less serious than homicide.

    “When the survey was repeated in 1966 and 1976, it showed that respondents viewed rape as slightly less serious than homicide”

    From Rape or Homicide: Which Is Worse? (2024) · cites this paper as Coombs, 1967

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coombs, C. H.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Coombs, Clyde H.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1967-05
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
85-91
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2004475050
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
Thurstone, social values, value measurement, value orientations, personality assessment, history of personality research
MeSH terms
Attitude, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Psychology, Social, Sex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review