Changing Values over the Last Half-Century: The Story of Thurstone's Crime Scales
Abstract
The present article is a follow-up of Thurstone's study, published 50 yr. ago, concerning the perceived seriousness of crimes. Comparisons were also made with Coomb's follow-up study from the mid-sixties. The continuing trend toward the judgment of sex offenses as less serious and offenses against the person as more serious was observed. The obtained scale also showed heightened sensitivity of subjects to offenses such as burglary, libel, counterfeiting, and forgery, reflecting the prevailing public opinion during the political trials of the mid-seventies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Respondents in a 1926 survey of college students rated rape as slightly more serious than homicide.
“Respondents in a 1926 survey of college students rated rape as slightly more serious than homicide”
From Rape or Homicide: Which Is Worse? (2024) · cites this paper as Krus et al., 1977
Sex offenses (adultery, rape, and seduction) declined in perceived seriousness from 1926 to 1976.
“In general, sex offenses (adultery, rape, and seduction) declined in perceived seriousness from 1926 to 1976”
From Rape or Homicide: Which Is Worse? (2024) · cites this paper as Krus et al., 1977
Cites
A law of comparative judgment.
Thurstone, L. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0070288 · Cited by 5,077 · see citing works
Techniques of attitude scale construction.
Edwards, A. L. (1957) · Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks · doi:10.1037/14423-000 · Cited by 1,670 · see citing works
The method of paired comparisons for social values.
Thurstone, L. L. (1927) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0065439 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
McCall, W. A. (1923) · MacMillan Co eBooks · doi:10.1037/13551-000 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Thurstone's measurement of social values revisited forty years later.
Coombs, C. H. (1967) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0024522 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Krus, D. J., & Krus, P. H. (1977) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447703700134 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ellis, L. (1987) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(87)90142-5 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
When a man hits a woman: moral evaluations and reporting violence to the police
Felson, R. B., & Feld, S. L. (2009) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.20323 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
BEHAVIORAL PREDICTION AND THE PROBLEM OF INCAPACITATION*
GOTIFREDSON, S. D., & Gottfredson, D. M. (1994) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01161.x · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Ellis, L. (1988) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(88)90151-1 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Additivity and Interactions in Offense Seriousness Scales
Gottfredson, S. D., Young, K. L., & Laufer, W. S. (1980) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/002242788001700103 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
EFFECTS OF CRIME SERIOUSNESS AND OFFENDER FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS ON RECOMMENDED TREATMENT
McKelvie, S. J., & Coley, J. (1993) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.1993.21.4.265 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Indermaur, D. (1996) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719609524883 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Krus, D. J., & Blackman, H. S. (1980) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1980.47.3.947 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationRape or Homicide: Which Is Worse?
Felson, R. B., & Silver, E. (2024) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-023-02799-w · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Russian Cannibals: The Case of the Downed Korean Airliner
Krus, D. J. (1986) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1986.59.1.3 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationAbramson, C. I., Curb, L. A., & Barber, K. R. (2011) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/11.pr0.108.1.182-212 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sentencing reform, sentencing guidelines, and related issues: A partial bibliography
Hoffman, P. B., Beck, J. L., Hardyman, P. L., & Scotkin, R. M. (1986) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/0047-2352(86)90096-6 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Escalamiento subjetivo de conductas delictivas
Juarros‐Basterretxea, J., Fernández, A. R., Buchwald, M. S., Martín, A. G., & Garcı́a-Cueto, E. (2013) · Consultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) · doi:10.17811/rema.18.1.2013.37-52 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Reactions to sexual and monetary bribes
Felson, R. B., Silver, E., & Silver, J. R. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-025-09670-z
- Authors
- Krus, D. J., Sherman, J. L., & Krus, P. H.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Reports
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1977-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 207-211
- ISSN
- 0033-2941 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-691X
- OpenAlex
- W2035864154
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 17.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Reports (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Keywords
- public opinion on crime, sexual offences, burglary, libel, counterfeiting, forgery, political trials, changing values, perceived seriousness of crime
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review