Cited by 961Deception detection and forensic psychologyHealth, Education, and Physical CultureEmotion and Mood Recognition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels.

Mehrabian, Albert, Ferris, Susan R.·1967·Journal of Consulting Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0024648

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 9 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 961

Metadata

Authors
Mehrabian, A., & Ferris, S. R.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting Psychology
Published
1967
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
248-252
ISSN
0095-8891 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015463594
Cited by
952
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 36
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Health, Education, and Physical Culture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
nonverbal communication, interpersonal perception, nonverbal cues
MeSH terms
Attitude, Communication, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review