The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,245
Theories of cognitive consistency : a sourcebook
Abelson, R. P. (1969) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,001
(2018) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation · doi:10.4135/9781506326139.n223 · Cited by 1,384
Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education
Parish, L., & Guilford, J. P. (1957) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3118885 · Cited by 839
The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment.
Hoffman, P. J. (1960) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0047807 · Cited by 698
Goldberg, L. R. (1970) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0029230 · Cited by 617
Measurement and prediction, clinical and statistical.
Sawyer, J. (1966) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0023624 · Cited by 594
Simple models or simple processes? Some research on clinical judgments.
Goldberg, L. R. (1968) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0026206 · Cited by 578
The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making.
Einhorn, H. J. (1970) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0028695 · Cited by 554
Analyzing the components of clinical inference.
Hammond, K. R., Hursch, C. J., & Todd, F. J. (1964) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0040736 · Cited by 406
Cited by
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook
Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208721 · Cited by 3,179
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025 · Cited by 2,349
“Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2648573 · Cited by 2,298
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dawes, R. M.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 1971-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 180-188
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2033743788
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0030868
- The paper
- Dawes, R. M. (1971). A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030868
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
