Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception.

Massaro, Dominic W.·1972·Psychological Review

Abstract

The present paper provides a theoretical account of the auditory recognition process. The theory describes recognition in terms of the information in a preperceptual auditory image and the time it is available for perceptual process-ing. Auditory recognition processes are assumed to be analogous to those operating in visual recognition. Necessary distinctions are drawn between auditory detection, recognition, and short-term memory. Studies of recogni-tion provide direct support for a preperceptual auditory image that outlasts the sensory input. The processing of the preperceptual auditory image cor-responds to a readout of the information available in a temporal or perceptual unit of information. Studies of speech perception support these conclusions. The syllable, not the phoneme, is implicated as the perceptual unit for speech perception. Thus, a framework is provided for the recognition stage of auditory information processing. This stage of perceptual processing outputs a syn-thesized percept that is utilized by succeeding stages of cognitive processing. The perceptual process is characterized by the temporal course of identification or recognition. Recognition of a stimulus requires an analysis and synthesis of the information available in the sensory input. In vision, the visual image during an eye fixation keeps the information available for the recognition process. In contrast, an auditory input continuously changes over time and the information in the stimulus might not remain available. However, if the auditory information was held in a pre-perceptual auditory store, auditory per-ception might also involve a readout of the auditory image of the stimulus. The im-portant characteristics of the auditory image will, of course, differ from those in the visual image. The major difference between the two images appears to be the critical dimension of the stimulus necessary for feature recognition. Whereas the spatial pattern is the important dimension

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0032264

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Massaro, D. W.
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1972
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
124-145
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2016813991
Cited by
332
References
61
FWCI
19.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0032264
The paper
Massaro, D. W. (1972). Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032264

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.