The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discrimination of cues in mazes: A resolution of the "place-vs.-response" question.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies in spatial learning. II. Place learning versus response learning.
Tolman, E. C., Ritchie, B. F., & Kalish, D. (1946) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0060262 · Cited by 343
Handbook of psychological research on the rat
Munn, N. L. (1950) · Cited by 268
A theory of discrimination learning.
Restle, F. (1955) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0046642 · Cited by 167
Self-citationA test of two explanations of spontaneous alternation.
Montgomery, K. C. (1952) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0058118 · Cited by 162
Spatial learning in the T-maze: the influence of direction, turn, and food location.
Blodgett, H. C., McCutchan, K., & Mathews, R. (1949) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0058978 · Cited by 103
Studies in spatial learning. V. Response learning vs. place learning by the non-correction method.
Tolman, E. C., Ritchie, B. F., & Kalish, D. (1947) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057434 · Cited by 63
A Consideration of Lashley's Theory of the Equipotentiality of Cerebral Action
Hunter, W. S. (1930) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.1930.9918224 · Cited by 43
Relative strength of place and response learning in the T maze.
Blodgett, H. C., & McCutchan, K. (1948) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0061366 · Cited by 38
The role of extramaze cues in place and response learning.
Scharlock, D. P. (1955) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0043052 · Cited by 26
Ritchie, B. F. (1947) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0056717 · Cited by 26
Cited by
Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues
Morris, R. G. M. (1981) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/0023-9690(81)90020-5 · Cited by 2,699
Memory deficits associated with senescence: A neurophysiological and behavioral study in the rat.
Barnes, C. A. (1979) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077579 · Cited by 2,088
Hippocampus, space, and memory
Olton, D. S., Becker, J. T., & Handelmann, G. E. (1979) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00062713 · Cited by 2,018
Learning and Memory Functions of the Basal Ganglia
Packard, M. G., & Knowlton, B. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142937 · Cited by 1,717
A unified framework for addiction: Vulnerabilities in the decision process
Redish, A. D., Jensen, S., & Johnson, A. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0800472x · Cited by 501
Metadata
- Authors
- Restle, F.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1957
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 217-228
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2079266677
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discrimination of cues in mazes: A resolution of the "place-vs.-response" question. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0040678
- The paper
- Restle, F. (1957). Discrimination of cues in mazes: A resolution of the "place-vs.-response" question. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040678
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
