The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reasoning in humans. I. On direction
Maier, N. R. F. (1930) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0073232 · Cited by 349
Self-citation
Cited by
The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms
Miller, D. (1983) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770 · Cited by 5,853
Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217 · Cited by 3,413
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667054 · Cited by 3,359
Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667029 · Cited by 2,971
Amason, A. C. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256633 · Cited by 2,584
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffman, L. R., & Maier, N. R. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1961-03
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 401-407
- ISSN
- 0096-851X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002731947
- Cited by
- 639
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
