Cited by 263Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceAesthetic Perception and AnalysisCognitive Abilities and Testing

Relations of creative responses to working time and instructions

Christensen, Paul R., Guilford, J. P., Wilson, R. C.·1957·Journal of Experimental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0045461

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Controlled attention is particularly relevant to divergent thinking because salient, unoriginal ideas can impede the creative thought process.

    “Controlled attention appears to be particularly relevant to divergent thinking because salient, unoriginal ideas can impede the creative thought process. During an alternate uses task, for example, concepts that are strongly semantically associated with the prompt cue (e.g., brick) are often the first responses produced (e.g., “build a brick house”; Beaty and Silvia, 2012, Christensen et al., 1957”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christensen, P. R., Guilford, J. P., & Wilson, R. C.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
1957
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
82-88
ISSN
0022-1015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088844392
Cited by
263
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
creative response, working hours, instruction, creativity, time constraints, task instructions
MeSH terms
Humans, Psychological Tests, Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review