The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The appraisal of body-cathexis: body-cathexis and the self.
Abstract
A substantial amount of current research in personality is devoted to the study of the individual's personal world. One object which is ever-present in this personal world is the body. It is the thesis of the present writers that the individual's attitudes towards his body are of crucial importance to any comprehensive theory of personality; yet little attention has been given to this subject by psychologists . The present paper is concerned with one variety of attitude, namely, body-cathexis. By bodycathexis is meant the degree of feeling of satisfaction or dissatisfacti on with the various parts or processes of the body. If the variable body-cathexis is to be deemed important for personality theory, it is nqcessary to demonstrate that it is related to other personality variables which are recognized as significant. For reasons which need not be discussed here, body-cathexis is believed to be integrally related to the self-concept, although identifiable as a separate aspect thereof. From this notion of relatedness of body and self, the following more specific hypotheses were formulated and tested: 1. Feelings about the body are commensurate with feelings about the self, when both are appraised by similar scales. 2. Negative feelings about the body are associated with anxiety, in the form of undue autistic concern with pain, disease, or bodily injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Response Sets and Test Validity
Cronbach, L. J. (1946) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316444600600405 · Cited by 898
Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design
Cronbach, L. J. (1950) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316445001000101 · Cited by 734
A Clinically Derived Test for Measuring Psychological Security-Insecurity
Maslow, A. H., Hirsh, E., Stein, M., & Honigmann, I. (1945) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.1945.10544493 · Cited by 145
Cited by
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance.
Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999) · doi:10.1037/10312-000 · Cited by 3,100
Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1991) · Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-590241-0.50008-3 · Cited by 1,833
The body esteem scale: multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population
Franzoi, S. L., & Shields, S. A. (1984) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4802_12 · Cited by 1,015
Social Comparison and the Idealized Images of Advertising
Richins, M. L. (1991) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209242 · Cited by 962
Metadata
- Authors
- Secord, P. F., & Jourard, S. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting Psychology
- Published
- 1953
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 343-347
- ISSN
- 0095-8891 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155552613
- Cited by
- 1,050
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The appraisal of body-cathexis: body-cathexis and the self. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0060689
- The paper
- Secord, P. F., & Jourard, S. M. (1953). The appraisal of body-cathexis: body-cathexis and the self. Journal of Consulting Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060689
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.