Cited by 1,015Eating Disorders and BehaviorsPersonality Traits and PsychologyBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

The body esteem scale: multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population

Franzoi, Stephen L., Shields, Stephanie A.·1984·Journal of Personality Assessment

Abstract

Norms and reliability and validity data are presented for an objectively scored Body Esteem Scale. Factor analysis of the scale revealed that body esteem is a multidimensional construct which differs for males and females. For males, the body esteem dimensions dealt with physical attractiveness, upper body strength, and physical condition. For females, the dimensions dealt with sexual attractiveness, weight concern, and physical condition. The three aspects of males' body esteem were more highly intercorrelated than those of the females, indicating a greater degree of body esteem differentiation for females than for males.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327752jpa4802_12

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Study 1, the Body-Esteem Scale may be less sensitive to the kinds of upward comparisons users are exposed to on Instagram because it assesses satisfaction with specific body parts and may not reflect appearance-focused comparisons.

    “The Body-Esteem Scale (Franzoi and Shields, 1984) assesses satisfaction with specific body parts (e.g., feet, arms), which may not reflect the appearance-focused comparisons prevalent on Instagram. As such, this scale may be less sensitive to the kinds of upward comparisons users are exposed to.”
  • The physical self-esteem measure in Study 1 had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.90).

    “Participants completed the Body-Esteem scale (α = 0.90)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franzoi, S. L., & Shields, S. A.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality Assessment
Published
1984-04
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
173-178
ISSN
  • 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7752
OpenAlex
W2091117084
Cited by
1,015
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 45
FWCI
7.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH014588)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
body esteem, Body Esteem Scale, sex differences, multidimensional construct, physical attractiveness, sexual attractiveness, weight concern, physical condition, upper body strength, university students, reliability statistics, validity
MeSH terms
Body Constitution, Body Image, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Physical Fitness, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review