The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning.
Abstract
A number of closed-loop postulations to explain motor skills learning and performance phenomena have appeared recently, but each of these views suffers from either (a) logical problems in explaining the phenomena or (b) predictions that are not supported by the empirical evidence. After these difficulties are discussed, a new theory for discrete motor learning is proposed that seems capable of explaining the existing findings. The theory is based on the notion of the schema and uses a recall memory to pro-duce movement and a recognition memory to evaluate response correctness. Some of the predictions are mentioned, research techniques and paradigms that can be used to test the predictions are listed, and data in support of the theory are presented. The field of motor behavior has become extremely interesting in the past few years, probably as a result of some rather severe changes in the way in which researchers have tackled their problems. Prior to about 1960, the area seemed to be dominated by the "task-oriented " approach (Pew, 1974). This approach emphasized "global " motor learning theories, such as that of Hull (1943), or emphasized no theories at all, and the area was dominated by experiment-ers who were testing the effects of a large number of independent variables on the overall learning and performance of motor tasks. Scoring was usually in terms of some very gross index of responding, such as time on target for 30 sec, and there was little concern for the events that changed within Appreciation is extended to my colleagues who provided many useful comments on an earlier draft
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Closed-Loop Theory of Motor Learning
Adams, J. A. (1971) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1971.10734898 · Cited by 1,636
Cited by
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495
Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986) · Consciousness and Self-Regulation · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1 · Cited by 4,455
Dual coding theory and education
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf01320076 · Cited by 2,108
“Constraints on the development of coordination,”
Newell, K. M. (1986) · Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-4460-2_19 · Cited by 2,053
What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior.
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.1.3 · Cited by 1,802
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, R. A.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1975-07
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 225-260
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2046329526
- Cited by
- 3,220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0076770
- The paper
- Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076770
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.