The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple Dimensions of Organizational Identification and Commitment as Predictors of Turnover Intentions and Psychological Well-Being.
Abstract
Meme si on reconnait que l'identification et l'engagement sont intimement lies aux aspects de l'attachement psychologique d'un employe a l'organisation, il n'y a pas d'analyse qui fait le lien entre les dimensions multiples de chaque construit. Dans la presente etude, les modeles a trois composants de l'identification et de l'engagement organisationnels ont ete etudies en tant qu'indicateurs previsionnels des intentions de depart (roulement du personnel) et du bien-etre psychologique (estime de soi, satisfaction dans la vie et autoefficacite) parmi les employes (N = 60) d'une petite organisation. Les employes tres en vue avaient tendance a etre ceux qui etaient engages, mais differentes dimensions de chaque construit ont ete liees de facon specifique a divers criteres. Les composants affectifs de l'identification et de l'engagement ont ete associes de facon negative aux intentions de depart et l'affect du groupe interne positif (soit les sentiments derives d'etre un membre de l'organisation) predisait les perceptions d'autoefficacite. L'engagement a la continuation etait distinct des autres indicateurs previsionnels. Les resultats justifient les autres efforts pour integrer les perspectives de la theorie d'identite sociale et de la psychologie organisationnelle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.171 · Cited by 6,449
A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One’s Social Identity
Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167292183006 · Cited by 3,057
Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination
Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579670 · Cited by 890
Phinney, J. S., Cantu, C. L., & Kurtz, D. A. (1997) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1023/a:1024500514834 · Cited by 727
Collective self-esteem and psychological well-being among White, Black, and Asian college students
Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Blaine, B., & Broadnax, S. (1994) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167294205007 · Cited by 718
Cited by
A Meta-Analytic Review of Social Identification and Health in Organizational Contexts
Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Schuh, S. C., Jetten, J., & van Dick, R. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868316656701 · Cited by 311
What is psychological well-being, really? a grassroots approach from the organizational sciences.
Dagenais-Desmarais, V., & Savoie, A. (2012) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-011-9285-3 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, G. E., & Cameron, J. E.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 159-169
- ISSN
- 0008-400X (ISSN-L)
- 1879-2669
- OpenAlex
- W2033318666
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 15.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Dimensions of Organizational Identification and Commitment as Predictors of Turnover Intentions and Psychological Well-Being. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0087253
- The paper
- Harris, G. E., & Cameron, J. E. (2005). Multiple Dimensions of Organizational Identification and Commitment as Predictors of Turnover Intentions and Psychological Well-Being. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.