Cited by 718Cultural Differences and ValuesRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Collective self-esteem and psychological well-being among White, Black, and Asian college students

Crocker, Jennifer, Luhtanen, Riia, Blaine, Bruce, Broadnax, Stephanie·1994·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

A total of 91 Black, 96 White, and 35 Asian college students completed the Collective Self-Esteem Scale (CSES), as well as measures of psychological well-being (personal self-esteem, life satisfaction, depression, and hopelessness). Correlations between the Public and Private subscales of the CSES were near zero for Blacks, moderate for Whites, and strong for Asians. The membership and private subscales of the general CSES were related to psychological well-being, even when the effects of personal self-esteem on well-being were partialed out. However, when the three groups were examined separately, the relation of CSE to well-being with personal self-esteem partialed out was nonsignificant for Whites, small for Blacks, and moderate to strong for Asians. General and race-specific CSE were correlated for all three groups, although the correlations were strongest for Asians. Implications for symbolic interactionist views of the self-concept, for formulations of mental health, and for methodological issues concerning the CSES are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167294205007

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Damage to one's culture directly harms health by denying individuals vital culture-related health protective factors including cultural/ethnic identity and pride, cultural coping and healing strategies, and supportive social, community, and family networks.

    “damage to one’s culture directly harms health by denying individuals vital culture-related health protective factors including (1) cultural/ethnic identity and pride (Crocker et al., 1994; Phinney and Ong, 2007); (2) cultural coping and healing strategies (Gone, 2013); and (3) supportive social, community, and family networks (Krieg, 2009; Norris et al., 2002).”

    From Cultural trauma as a fundamental cause of health disparities (2022) · cites this paper as Crocker et al., 1994

  • When controlling for PSE, the association between CSE and well-being varied by ethnic group: nonsignificant for Whites, small for Blacks, and moderate to strong for Asians.

    “Indeed, they found that CSE was positively associated with well-being among White, Black, and Asian college students in the United States; however, when controlling for PSE, the relationship of CSE with well-being became nonsignificant for Whites, small for Blacks, and moderate to strong for Asians [27].”
  • CSE was positively associated with well-being among White, Black, and Asian college students in the United States.

    “Indeed, they found that CSE was positively associated with well-being among White, Black, and Asian college students in the United States; however, when controlling for PSE, the relationship of CSE with well-being became nonsignificant for Whites, small for Blacks, and moderate to strong for Asians [27].”
  • Previous findings showed that collective self-esteem contributed to subjective well-being, even after controlling for personal self-esteem.

    “This result appears surprising because previous findings showed that CSE contributed to subjective well-being, even after controlling for PSE [27, 31].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Blaine, B., & Broadnax, S.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Crocker, Jennifer
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
1994-10
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
503-513
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2101256814
Cited by
718
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 33
FWCI
18.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
collective self-esteem, psychological well-being, self-esteem, life satisfaction, depression, hopelessness, racial differences, African American college students, White college students, self-concept, symbolic interactionism, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review