CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,922Behavioral Health and InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change.

Open access
Prochaska, James O., DiClemente, Carlo C.·1982·Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice
DOI 10.1037/h0088437
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Transtheoretical therapy is presented as one alternative within the Zeitgeist seeking a synthesis for the increasing proliferation of therapeutic systems. From a comparative analysis of 18 leading systems, five basic processes of change were identified. Each process can be applied at either the level of the individual's experience or environment. In studying how individuals change on their own compared with change in formalized treatments, four stages of change have been identified. Individuals changing within and without therapy appear to apply three verbal processes of change in the contemplation and determination stages and then apply two behavioral processes in the action and maintenance stages. Rather than being theoretically incompatible, the verbal processes are most important in preparing clients for action, while the behavioral processes become most important once clients have committed themselves to act. Psychotherapy appears to be approaching a crisis or a new wave of creativity. The potential for crisis comes in part from the unprecedented pace at which new therapies are being placed on the market (Prochaska, 1979). In 1975 Parloff reported that there were 130 therapies on the therapeutic marketplace (or jungleplace as he more aptly described it). By 1979 Time magazine was reporting that there were over 200 therapies, and that the confusion of over-choice was adding to the depression of psychiatry. Divergence has dominated the past decade of development within the field of psychotherapy (Prochaska, 1979). Yet divergent 1 This work was partially supported by Grant CA27821 from the National Cancer Institute. * Requests for reprints should be sent to James O. Prochaska, Dept. of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881. CARLO C. DI CLEMENTE Texas Research Institute of Mental Sciences thinking has been characterized by Guilford (1956), among others, as a necessary part of creativity. The increased divergence in psychotherapy thus provides the potential for a new wave of creativity. What is needed to prevent the increasing divergence from leading to fragmentation, confusion and chaos and allow it to be the foundation for a more fertile future? Heinz Werner's (1948) theory of development may serve as a guide in this regard. Development, as opposed to other forms of change, such as regression or chaos, is characterized by a combination of increasing differentiation and hierarchic integration. The increasing production of new forms of psychotherapy may indeed be an expression of the increasing differentiation of a growing discipline like psychotherapy. Increasing differentiation alone, however, can become like a cancer of uncontrolled growth that threatens to destroy the very body of knowledge in which it is growing. Unless increasing differentiation is matched by more effective forms of integration, then crisis rather than creativity will be the result. In Guilford's (1956) terms an increase in divergent thinking needs to be followed by higher levels of convergent thinking. What have been some of the professional responses to the increasing divergence in psychotherapy? Psychiatry's depression over the increased confusion is being treated in part by an increased reliance on chemotherapy. The emphasis on medication has the advantage of reaffirming psychiatry's medical identity and of relying on treatments that have perhaps the most consistent empirical support {Time, 1979; Luborsky, 1975). Clinical social workers have mounted a se-

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0088437

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 20 references

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,015

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C.
Affiliations
University of Rhode Island (US)
ORCID
Venue
Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1982
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
276-288
ISSN
0033-3204 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1037/h0088437
OpenAlex
W2134646220
Cited by
3,922
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 101 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 158 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 136 · 2021: 209 · 2020: 247 · 2019: 174 · 2018: 158 · 2017: 175 · 2016: 153 · 2015: 152 · 2014: 160 · 2013: 170 · 2012: 146
FWCI
21.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
transtheoretical model, stages of change, change processes, integrative psychotherapy, differentiation and integration, medical pluralism, self-directed change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review