Cited by 113Cognitive Abilities and TestingEducational and Psychological AssessmentsPsychological Testing and Assessment

Utility of intelligence tests for treatment planning, classification, and placement decisions: recent empirical findings and future directions.

Gresham, Frank M., Witt, Joseph C.·1997·School Psychology Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0088961

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gresham, F. M., & Witt, J. C.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Venue
School Psychology Quarterly
Published
1997
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
249-267
ISSN
  • 1045-3830 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1560
OpenAlex
W2006447383
Cited by
113
References
50
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
School Psychology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
intelligence tests, treatment planning, classification, placement decisions, special education, psychometric assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review