Cited by 17Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSleep and related disordersDigital Mental Health Interventions

Can Mindfulness Mechanistically Target Worry to Improve Sleep Disturbances? Theory and Study Protocol for App-Based Anxiety Program.

Open access
Brewer, Judson A., Roy, Alexandra, Deluty, Alana, Liu, Tao, Hoge, Elizabeth A.·2020·Health Psychology

Abstract

Objective: Anxiety is associated with sleep disturbance and insomnia. Mindfulness-based interventions, such as mindfulness-based stress reduction, have shown consistent anxiety reduction. Mindfulness training has been theorized to affect reinforcement learning, affecting habitual behaviors such as smoking and overeating, but a direct mechanistic link between the use of mindfulness training for anxiety reduction and improvement in sleep has not been studied. Moreover, the mechanisms by which mindfulness might affect worry and subsequent sleep disturbances have not been elucidated. This study protocol evaluates the impact an app-based mindfulness training program for anxiety might have on decreasing worry and improvement in sleep. Method: A randomized controlled study will be conducted in approximately 80 adults with worry that interferes with their sleep. Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to two groups: treatment-as-usual (TAU) or TAU + App-Based Mindfulness Training (Unwinding Anxiety app). The primary outcomes will be the non-reactivity subscale of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System sleep quality measures (Baer et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2011). Secondary outcomes will include the Penn State Worry Questionnaire, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Scale (Mehling et al., 2012; Meyer, Miller, Metzger, & Borkovec, 1990; Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, & Löwe, 2006). Discussion: This study will be the first to test the mechanism of app-based mindfulness training on worry and sleep disturbance. Testing the mechanistic effects of mindfulness training using the science of behavior change framework will help move the field forward both in further elucidation of potential mechanisms of mindfulness (e.g., targeting reinforcement learning) and determining whether such a platform might be a viable method for delivering high-fidelity treatment at scale and for a low cost.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/hea0000874

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

11 of 39 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Worrying specifically contributes to sleep disturbance.

    “research has demonstrated that worrying in particular contributes to sleep disturbance (Bagley, Kelly, Buckhalt, & El-Sheikh, 2015; Yan et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bagley, Kelly, Buckhalt, & El-Sheikh, 2015 source
    • cites Yan et al., 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction and similar mindfulness programs consistently reduce anxiety.

    “Mindfulness-based interventions, such as Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction, have shown consistent anxiety reduction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Goyal et al., 2014 source
    • cites Hofmann, Sawyer, Witt, & Oh, 2010 source

      The Results (page not available) report significant pooled pre-to-post anxiety reductions for both Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy. However, the Results also report no significant anxiety reduction in the one study of individuals with depression, so “consistent” overstates the finding across populations. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    People with insomnia tend to be outcome-driven and respond to external sleep cues instead of their physiological states.

    “People with insomnia tend to be outcome-driven and respond to external sleep cues (e.g. “I should be in bed by 10:30” or “It’s important to sleep because I have a presentation tomorrow”) instead of responding to their physiological states (Ong, Ulmer, & Manber, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ong, Ulmer, & Manber, 2012 source
  • Premisecitation

    Worry is common among people with insomnia.

    “Worry is common among people with insomnia (McGowan, Behar, & Luhmann, 2016);”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McGowan, Behar, & Luhmann, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisenone given

    No direct mechanistic link has been studied between using mindfulness training for anxiety reduction and improving sleep.

    “but a direct mechanistic link between the use of mindfulness training for anxiety reduction and improvement in sleep has not been studied”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 26
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In smoking and emotional eating studies, mindfulness training decoupled craving from behavior, with a fivefold increase in smoking cessation and a 40% reduction in craving-related eating.

    “in studies of cigarette smoking and emotional eating, mindfulness training was found to mechanistically decouple cigarette or food craving from smoking or eating, with a subsequent fivefold increase in smoking cessation rates, and a 40% reduction in craving-related eating, respectively (Brewer et al., 2011; Elwafi, Witkiewitz, Mallik, Thornhill-IV, & Brewer, 2013; Ashley E. Mason, Jhaveri, Cohn, &”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brewer et al., 2011 source

      The Results (§3.2; page not provided) report 31% point-prevalence abstinence with mindfulness training versus 6% with the comparison treatment at 17 weeks—approximately fivefold. The Introduction (§1) proposes that mindfulness may help people experience cravings without smoking, but this trial does not establish mechanistic decoupling. It does not study emotional eating or report a 40% reduction in craving-related eating. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Elwafi, Witkiewitz, Mallik, Thornhill-IV, & Brewer, 2013 source

      The Results (§3.2; page unavailable) report that the craving–smoking correlation weakened after mindfulness training. The Introduction (§1; page unavailable) reports 31% versus 6% abstinence at four months in an earlier trial, consistent with an approximately fivefold difference. This paper does not report the claimed 40% reduction in craving-related eating, and its smoking findings do not establish that decoupling caused the higher cessation rate. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ashley E. Mason, Jhaveri, Cohn, & Brewer, 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Robust mediation analysis will use the R package ROBMED, which follows Preacher and Hayes principles but uses an MM-regression estimator and robust bootstrap to handle model violations like outliers.

    “For the latter, we will utilize the ROBMED package in R which follows the same principles found in the Preacher & Hayes test (Preacher & Hayes, 2008) but employs a robust MM-regression estimator (Yohai, 1987) and a fast and robust bootstrap (Salibian-Barrera & Van Aelst, 2008) to compensate for deviations from model assumptions, for example, outliers (Alfons, Ates, & Groenen, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Preacher & Hayes, 2008 source
    • cites Yohai, 1987

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Salibian-Barrera & Van Aelst, 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mindfulness training has shown promise in both efficacy and cost, with effect sizes comparable to gold-standard treatments.

    “Next-generation behavioral treatments such as mindfulness training have shown promise both in efficacy and cost (treatment is largely delivered in group format), with effect sizes rivaling gold-standard treatments (Goyal et al., 2014; Hofmann, Sawyer, Witt, & Oh, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Goyal et al., 2014 source

      The Discussion reports small improvements in anxiety and depressive symptoms and says their effect sizes are comparable to those expected from antidepressants in a primary-care population. It does not support the claim about cost or establish that mindfulness rivals gold-standard treatments generally; the Discussion cautions that trials comparing meditation with known treatments were too small to establish equivalence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Hofmann, Sawyer, Witt, & Oh, 2010 source

      The Results (page unavailable) report promising effects on anxiety and mood symptoms; in patients with anxiety and mood disorders, effect sizes of 0.97 and 0.95 are similar to the conventional CBT estimate of 0.95 cited in the Discussion. But the Discussion calls for future comparisons of cost-effectiveness, so this paper does not establish a cost advantage or support the group-format explanation for one. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    ClinicalTrials.gov was selected instead of OSF because a 2016 NIH policy requires its use.

    “This was chosen in place of Open Science Framework (OSF) because the National Institute of Health requires its use per a 2016 policy update (Toelch & Ostwald, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Toelch & Ostwald, 2018 source

      The Preregistration section (page unavailable) describes OSF as a suitable platform, and An example project (page unavailable) says the authors uploaded data to OSF. Searches for ClinicalTrials.gov and a 2016 NIH registration policy found no passage addressing either the alleged requirement or the reason for choosing ClinicalTrials.gov instead of OSF. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Questions persist about the scalability and clinician competence of in-person mindfulness-based interventions.

    “However, concerns remain around scalability and competency of in-person delivered MBI treatments (Crane et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crane et al., 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Once the program reached a Net Promoter Score of 96, its videos, animations, and brief exercises were finalized and packaged for Android and iOS delivery.

    “After a Net Promoter Score (“How likely is it that you would recommend this to a friend or colleague?”) of 96 was achieved (70+ is rated as “world class”), videos, animations, and in-the-moment exercises were finalized and bundled into an app-based delivery platform that can be delivered via Android and iOS operating systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    The mechanisms by which mindfulness may affect worry and subsequent sleep disturbances have not been clarified.

    “Moreover, the mechanisms by which mindfulness may affect worry and subsequent sleep disturbances have not been elucidated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    The Unwinding Anxiety app is similar to the combined MBSR/CBT-i curriculum studied by Ong et al., with significant overlap in principles, components, and activities.

    “The Unwinding Anxiety app bears similarity to the combined MBSR/CBT-i curriculum studied by Ong et al – and the principles, components, and activities overlap significantly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participants will not know which group they are in.

    “Participants will be blinded to group assignment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Participants will be allocated to the two arms in equal numbers under a parallel-group design.

    “Randomization will be on a 1:1 schedule in a parallel group design.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The authors will consider LASSO to select important covariates and reduce possible model overfitting.

    “To overcome possible model overfitting, we will consider using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) for the selection of important covariates in the model (Tibshirani, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tibshirani, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Reinforcement learning depends on the rewards of one's actions, but a person who habitually reacts to a trigger may not be aware of the present-moment reward value of that action.

    “Reinforcement learning is dependent upon the rewards of one’s actions; however, if someone is habitually reacting to a trigger, he or she may not be aware of the present-moment reward value of the action.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Tallis and Eysenck proposed that worry engages fight-or-flight states by alerting and preparing people for unresolved threatening situations.

    “Tallis and Eysenck (1994) proposed that worry engages fight-or-flight states through alerting and (theoretically) preparing individuals for unresolved threatening situations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tallis and Eysenck (1994)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The person who randomizes participants and performs assessments will be excluded from analyzing the data.

    “The individual who is responsible for the randomization of participants and conducting the assessments will not be involved in data analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    In the authors' earlier study, non-reactivity rose by 3.5 points (SD 4.85) and PSQI sleep disturbance fell by 2.6 points (SD 3.6).

    “This prior study found an increase of 3.5 points (SD = 4.85) in non-reactivity and a decrease of 2.6 points (SD = 3.6) in sleep disturbances based on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    At the final assessment, adverse events and medication changes will be asked about; severe spontaneous events will be reported immediately, while others will be recorded and reported quarterly.

    “Adverse events and medication changes will be solicited at each participant’s final assessment for the study. Severe spontaneously reported adverse events will be reported immediately and all others will be recorded and reported quarterly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    An independent statistician will generate the allocation sequence using random block sizes of four and six, aiming for roughly equal arm sizes.

    “Assignments will be generated by an independent statistician in random blocks of four and six to ensure approximately equal numbers of participants in the two study arms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Two people not involved in data collection will prepare and check the envelopes, which will stay sealed until after enrollment and consent.

    “The envelopes will be prepared, reviewed by two individuals independent of data acquisition, and will remain sealed before participants are enrolled and consented.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Science of Behavior Change approach tests whether an intervention engages its intended target and whether that target engagement leads to a desired behavior change outcome.

    “The SOBC approach involves testing whether an intervention engages an intended target, and whether target engagement leads to a desired behavior change outcome (Eisenberg et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eisenberg et al., 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    A one-sample t-test indicated that 64 participants would provide 80% power for non-reactivity change and 83% power for sleep quality change, using a two-sided type I error.

    “A one sample t-test determined a sample size of 64 will have 80% and 83% power with two-sided type I error, to detect a statistically significant difference between groups in changes non-reactivity scores and sleep quality respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: No prior studies of the intervention existed at the time.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Worry is the central defining feature of generalized anxiety disorder, though it also occurs in other anxiety disorders.

    “Worry is widely regarded as the central defining feature of generalized anxiety disorder, although it also occurs in other anxiety disorders (Association, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Association, 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Anxiety- and worry-specific content was created from clinical experience with anxious patients and repeated pilot testing among self-identified anxious members of the public, then refined.

    “Specific anxiety and worry-related content was developed from a combination of clinical experience with anxious individuals and several rounds of iterative pilot testing with the general public who self-described as anxious, after which the content and delivery of the modules and exercises were refined.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Allocation will be concealed in sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes given to eligible participants.

    “Eligible participants will receive a sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelope containing their random assignment: treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU + an app-based mindfulness training (TAU + MT).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The authors used their earlier MBSR study in anxious individuals to guide the sample-size calculation.

    “To date there have not been previous studies of the intervention, therefore sample size calculations were informed by our previous work with MBSR for individuals with anxiety.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: No prior studies of the intervention existed at the time.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The planned recruitment is 80 people to allow for 20% dropout.

    “To account for 20% attrition, we plan to recruit 80 individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a 24-hour monitoring study, people with high worry in bed had lower sleep efficiency, more nocturnal awakenings, and higher heart rate than those without high worry.

    “A 24-hour monitoring study indicated that participants with high levels of worry in bed had lower sleep efficiency (expressed as a percentage of time in bed), increased nocturnal awakenings, and a higher heart rate than those who did not experience high levels of worry (Weise, Ong, Tesler, Kim, & Roth, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Weise, Ong, Tesler, Kim, & Roth, 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A prolonged fight-or-flight state may have far-reaching health consequences, including myocardial infarction and insomnia.

    “A prolonged fight-or-flight state may have far-reaching health consequences, ranging from myocardial infarction to insomnia (Brosschot, Gerin, & Thayer, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brosschot, Gerin, & Thayer, 2006 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The one- and two-month post-baseline mediation time points were selected to permit time-ordered mediation testing and to occur before TAU participants receive the intervention.

    “These time points were chosen because they will allow for an evaluation of time ordered mediation and are prior to the TAU group receiving the intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Study data will be anonymized and kept on password-protected servers, and paper documents will be stored in a locked cabinet.

    “All study data will be anonymized and stored on password protected servers while physical documents will be kept in locked filing cabinet.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As mindfulness practice deepens, the rewards of curious awareness, even of unpleasant emotional states, become clearer because curiosity feels better than anxiety or worry thinking.

    “as one deepens a mindfulness practice, the rewards of curious awareness, even of unpleasant emotional states, become clearer, because curiosity feels better than anxiety or worry thinking.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The PI, statistician, and the research associate who analyzes the data will be kept unaware of group allocation.

    “The Principal Investigator, statistician, and Research Associate conducting data analysis will be blinded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participants will be randomly allocated 1:1 to treatment as usual or treatment as usual plus app-based mindfulness training.

    “Subjects will be randomly allocated (1:1) to two groups: treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU + app-based mindfulness training (MT; Unwinding Anxiety app).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia has become a first-line treatment for insomnia because of its relative efficacy and clinically meaningful effect sizes.

    “cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia [CBT-i]), have become first-line therapies for the treatment of insomnia due to their relative efficacy and clinically meaningful effect sizes (Trauer, Qian, Doyle, Rajaratnam, & Cunnington, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Trauer, Qian, Doyle, Rajaratnam, & Cunnington, 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Worry as an avoidance strategy is unpleasant and often does not consistently solve the problems that triggered it.

    “worry as an avoidance strategy comes with two critical caveats: (1) worry is unpleasant, and (2) often worry thinking doesn’t consistently solve the problems that triggered it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    An independent Data Safety Monitor will oversee the trial and receive regular status reports.

    “This study will be overseen by an independent Data Safety Monitor (DSM) who will receive regular reports regarding the status of the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Groups will be called Group 1 and Group 2 so that the PI and analysts remain pseudo-blinded to arm identity until analyses finish.

    “Each group will be labeled “Group 1” or “Group 2” to ensure that the principal investigator and members of the study team who conduct the statistical analyses are pseudo-blinded to group membership until all analyses are complete.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People use worry to avoid unpleasant emotions, which reduces distress and increases a sense of control, making worry an avoidance response.

    “individuals engage in worry as a way to avoid unpleasant emotions, resulting in decreased distress and an increased sense of control—essentially an avoidance response (T. Borkovec, Ray, & Stober, 1998; T. D. Borkovec et al., 1983).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites T. Borkovec, Ray, & Stober, 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites T. D. Borkovec et al., 1983 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Brown University's IRB will approve the study before enrollment, and any protocol changes will require IRB review before they are implemented.

    “Prior to the enrollment of participants, approval will be obtained from Brown University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) and any changes to the research protocol will be reviewed by the IRB before implementation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The app-based mindfulness program is intended to reduce worry at a fundamental mechanistic level.

    “This training is designed to help individuals extinguish worry at a basic mechanistic level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Paying attention while caught in a worry thought loop makes the behavior's result clearer and leads to a natural neural depreciation of its reward value.

    “when one pays attention when getting caught in a worry thought loop, the result of the behavior becomes clearer, leading to a natural neural depreciation of its reward value.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    When the negative affective qualities of worry are strong, the prefrontal cortex disengages and higher-order functions such as problem solving are impaired.

    “When the negative affective qualities of worry are strong enough, the prefrontal cortex disengages, impeding higher-order prefrontal cortical function, such as problem solving (Arnsten, 2009, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Arnsten, 2009, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mindful nonjudging and curious allowing of experience helps people avoid being triggered by positive or negative affective states and thus avoid habitual behavior.

    “when someone is being mindful, the attitudinal quality of not judging and allowing the experience to unfold with curiosity helps avoid being triggered by either positive or negative affective states, thus avoiding habitual behavior (Brewer & Pbert, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brewer & Pbert, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Delivering cognitive anxiety treatments at population scale is difficult because trained clinicians are scarce, therapy takes time, and costs are high.

    “Cognitive approaches to treat anxiety can be difficult to deliver at a population level due to the limited availability of highly trained individuals, time requirements of therapy, and associated costs; therefore, mindfulness-based approaches, which are delivered in a group format, may address some of these challenges.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The trial will be registered in advance on ClinicalTrials.gov.

    “We will preregister the study on ClinicalTrials.gov.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
44 of 44
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The nonreactivity subscale of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire validly measures the mindfulness mechanism through which app-based training reduces worry and improves sleep.

    “The primary outcomes will be the nonreactivity subscale of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire and PROMIS sleep quality measures.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The PROMIS sleep quality measures validly capture the sleep disturbance relevant to worry.

    “The primary outcomes will be the nonreactivity subscale of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire and PROMIS sleep quality measures.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Unwinding Anxiety app delivers mindfulness training with sufficient fidelity to engage reinforcement learning.

    “we developed an application (app)-based digital therapeutic program that delivers mindfulness training in a standardized, high-fidelity and accessible manner”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Participants recruited through Facebook advertisements with high worry and sleep interference are representative of the target population.

    “Individuals who express an interest in using an app-based mindfulness training program to reduce worry and anxiety to improve their sleep will be recruited using Facebook advertisements”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No prior studies of the intervention existed at the time.

    “To date there have not been previous studies of the intervention, therefore sample size calculations were informed by our previous work with MBSR for individuals with anxiety.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most meditation apps have not been clinically tested, few are theory-driven to target anxiety and worry mechanisms, and even fewer address mediation from treatment to target to outcome.

    “Although many meditation-related apps are available, very few have been tested with regard to clinical efficacy, fewer have been designed based on hypothesized theory to specifically target purported mechanisms related to the development and perpetuation of anxiety and worry, and even fewer have taken into account potential mediation effects that can link treatment to target to outcome.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    This study is among the first to test mechanistic effects of app-based mindfulness training for anxiety on worry and sleep disturbance.

    “This study is one of the first to test the mechanistic effects of app-based mindfulness training for anxiety on worry and sleep disturbance.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study was approved by the Brown University Institutional Review Board and pre-registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, with a published protocol paper.

    “The study was approved by the Brown University Institutional Review Board and study design, statistical analyses, and outcomes were pre-registered at ClinicalTrials.gov in addition to the publication of a protocol paper (22).”

    From Targeting Anxiety to Improve Sleep Disturbance: A Randomized Clinical Trial of App-Based Mindfulness Training. (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

    The cited work is a published study protocol, but its Methods > Monitoring section says Brown University IRB approval 'will be obtained' before enrollment, not that it had already been granted. Measurements > Open Science approach likewise says the study 'will preregister' on ClinicalTrials.gov; it does not establish that the design, analyses, and outcomes had already been preregistered. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Aversive stimuli can trigger worry as an avoidant behavior, which then becomes habitual.

    “Therefore, aversive stimuli can trigger worry as an avoidant behavior, which then becomes habitual [22].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Participants cannot be blinded to whether they receive the app

    Minor

    The protocol says participants will be blinded to their assignment, but it also says only those assigned to the app group will install and use the app at the initial visit. That procedure reveals which group a participant is in.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brewer, J. A., Roy, A., Deluty, A., Liu, T., & Hoge, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2020-09
Volume
39
Issue
9
Pages
776-784
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W3080355074
Cited by
16
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R21DA046957)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mindfulness training, worry, sleep disorders, insomnia, smartphone-based intervention, mobile health, anxiety, reinforcement learning, interoceptive awareness, sleep quality, mechanisms of change, behavior change, generalized anxiety disorder
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep Wake Disorders, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Social Media, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review