The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monotonicity of effect sizes: questioning kappa-squared as mediation effect size measure
Abstract
Mediation analysis is important for research in psychology and other social and behavioral sciences. Great progress has been made in testing mediation effects and in constructing their confidence intervals. Mediation effect sizes have also been considered. Preacher and Kelley (2011) proposed and recommended κ² as an effect size measure for a mediation effect. In this article, we argue that κ² is not an appropriate effect size measure for mediation models, because of its lack of the property of rank preservation (e.g., the magnitude of κ² may decrease when the mediation effect that κ² represents increases). Furthermore, κ² can lead to paradoxical results in multiple mediation models. We show that the problem of κ² is due to (a) the improper calculation of the maximum possible value of the indirect effect, and (b) mathematically, the maximum possible indirect effect is infinity, implying that the definition of κ² is mathematically incorrect. At this time, it appears that the traditional mediation effect size measure PM (the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect), together with some other statistical information, should be preferred for basic mediation models. But for inconsistent mediation models where the indirect effect and the direct effect have opposite signs, the situation is less clear. Other considerations and suggestions for future research are also discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Three single-arm trials showed that increased global trait mindfulness mediated the impact of MBIs on reduction in GAD severity [8] and perceived stress [9-11]”
In the citing paper
“evidence that MBIs better equipped people with GAD and depression with the skills to perceive emotions and thoughts as transient occurrences rather than personally associating with them – a process called “decentering” – than controls [8, 95]”
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/651257 · Cited by 12,583
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
Hayes, A. F. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903310360 · Cited by 9,757
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83 · Cited by 9,406
Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators
Hedges, L. V. (1981) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164588 · Cited by 5,695
Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis
MacKinnon, D. P. (2012) · doi:10.4324/9780203809556 · Cited by 5,618
Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1023/a:1026595011371 · Cited by 4,188
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 350
Spendelow, J. S., & Joubert, H. E. (2018) · American Journal of Men s Health · doi:10.1177/1557988317748123 · Cited by 11
“The recommendations of Wen and Fan (2015) were followed in the current study by reporting P M when the indirect and total effects are both in the same direction.”
BackgroundMethodEach One Counts: Basic Needs Mediating the Association Between Social Support and Vitality at Work
Karkkola, P., Kuittinen, M., Hintsa, T., Ryynänen, J., & Simonen, A. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.16993/sjwop.54 · Cited by 12
“The ratio of specific indirect associations to total association is used to illustrate the magnitudes of the indirect associations (Wen and Fan, 2015).”
MethodBao, Z., Jiang, Y., Zhu, J., & Zhang, W. (2020) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-00731-2 · Cited by 12
Chen, S., Fang, J., Wang, L.-M., & Liu, C.-L. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236030 · Cited by 15
“There is not an ideal index of the mediation effects of an inconsistent mediation model in which the indirect effect ab and the direct effect c’ have opposite signs [60].”
BackgroundOjala, M., & Anniko, M. K. (2020) · Psyke & Logos · doi:10.7146/pl.v41i2.127498 · Cited by 11
“The ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect (PM) was used to assess effect size in line with recommendations by Wen and Fan (2015).”
MethodMediation Analysis in Experimental Research
Koschate‐Fischer, N., & Schwille, E. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_34 · Cited by 8
Li, X., Lu, J., Li, B., Li, H., Jin, L., & Qiu, J. (2017) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.06.054 · Cited by 10
The Sibling Effect for Delinquency: Mediation by Proactive Criminal Thinking and Moderation by Age
Walters, G. D. (2019) · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x19872963 · Cited by 10
“Various effect size measures have been proposed for assessing the strength of an indirect effect, but each has serious limitations (Preacher & Kelley, 2011; Walters, 2018a; Wen & Fan, 2015).”
BackgroundBao, Z., Wang, F., & Jiang, Y. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01847-9 · Cited by 10
Brockenberry, L. O., Braitman, A. L., & Harrell, P. T. (2022) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107253 · Cited by 10
Deceptive Affectionate Messages: Mate Retention Deployed Under the Threat of Partner Infidelity
Caton, N. R., & Horan, S. M. (2019) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/1474704919867902 · Cited by 10
“Effect sizes were not calculated due to their recent controversy (see Wen & Fan, 2015).”
BackgroundMarentes-Castillo, M., Castillo, I., Tomás-Marco, I., & Álvarez, O. (2024) · Sports · doi:10.3390/sports12020041 · Cited by 9
“Our results not only confirm that self-efficacy is an associated and mediating variable towards PA practice, but also highlight the interaction between healthy behaviors, such as the spillover effect, which has recently been studied and shows that weight regulation behaviors, and in this case HEW…”
Maras, J., & Leger, K. A. (2024) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116701 · Cited by 9
“For a meaningful metric of effect size (Wen and Fan, 2015), the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect (P M ) has been included for all variables (self-rated mental health P M = 0.29; anxiety P M = 2; depression P M = 0.5; subjective well-being P M = 0.2).”
BackgroundInfluentialInterpersonal perception and interpersonal spin
Clegg, K., Moskowitz, D. S., Miners, C. T. H., Andrevski, G., Sadikaj, G., & Zuroff, D. C. (2020) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12594 · Cited by 8
“The ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect (PM) was calculated as an estimate of effect size (Alwin & Hauser, 1975; MacKinnon, 2008; MacKinnon & Dwyer, 1993; Preacher & Kelley, 2011; Wen & Fan, 2015).”
MethodRossi, A. A., Gearhardt, A. N., Castelnuovo, G., & Mannarini, S. (2020) · Cited by 9
Stargel, L. E., & Easterbrooks, M. A. (2021) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2021.10.005 · Cited by 13
Intimate Partner Violence, Legal Systems and Barriers for African American Women
Gutowski, E. R., Freitag, S. L., Zhang, S., Thompson, M. P., & Kaslow, N. J. (2022) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605221090561 · Cited by 9
“…sample was of adequate size to conduct a moderated-mediation analysis with one mediator and one moderator, we performed an a priori power analysis with a specified power of .95, alpha level of .05, and an effect size of .15 (medium effect size for multiple regression analysis) (Wen & Fan, 2015).”
MethodMale-Type Depression Mediates the Relationship between Avoidant Coping and Suicidal Ideation in Men
O’Gorman, K. M., Wilson, M. J., Seidler, Z. E., English, D., Zajac, I. T., Fisher, K., & Rice, S. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191710874 · Cited by 12
“The effect size measure PM [58] was calculated to assess the magnitude of the indirect effect as a proportion of the total effect.”
MethodMaltagliati, S., Saoudi, I., Sarrazin, P. G., Cullati, S., Sieber, S., Chalabaëv, A., & Cheval, B. (2022) · SSM - Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101272 · Cited by 9
Chen, M., & Cao, C. (2023) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13972 · Cited by 8
Woodward, E. C., Viana, A. G., Raines, E. M., Candelari, A. E., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2018) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-018-9943-4 · Cited by 8
Zhou, J., Liu, H., Wen, H., Wang, X., Wang, Y., & Yang, T. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862666 · Cited by 14
Dai, Q., Huang, H., Zhang, X., Su, Y., Liu, C., & Li, Q. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192214987 · Cited by 11
Herreen, D., Rice, S., & Zajac, I. (2022) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.10.007 · Cited by 8
Liu, S., Ying, J., Wang, X., Shi, J., & Wu, X. (2023) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12958 · Cited by 7
Zhang, N., Ji, C., Liu, L., Ye, E., & Yuan, C. (2024) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/s00223-024-01228-x · Cited by 7
“In the 30–45 years age group, the mediation effect and direct effect showed inconsistency (mediation effect = 0.0023, direct effect = -0.0083), with no significant effect size calculated [26].”
BackgroundInfluentialApplying Ecotourism Knowledge and Destination Image in Planned Behavior Theory in Ecotourism
Huo, H., Chen, J., & Li, W. (2023) · Polish Journal of Environmental Studies · doi:10.15244/pjoes/172047 · Cited by 7
“There are multiple mediating variables to better explain the influence of independent variables on dependent variables, which requires the establishment of a chain multiple mediating model [35].”
BackgroundRaines, E. M., Viana, A. G., Trent, E. S., Conroy, H. E., Woodward, E. C., Zvolensky, M. J., & Storch, E. A. (2020) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2020.1790644 · Cited by 7
“Additionally, following recent recommendations (Wen & Fan, 2015), the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect (i.e., P M , or mediation ratio; Ditlevsen et al., 2005) was reported as a measure of effect size for significant indirect effects.”
BackgroundRoussotte, F. F., Siddarth, P., Merrill, D. A., Narr, K. L., Ercoli, L. M., Martinez, J., Emerson, N. D., Barrio, J. R., & Small, G. W. (2017) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2017.09.001 · Cited by 7
“We used percent mediation [PM] as a measure of effect size (27, 28).”
Mediation Analysis in Experimental Research
Koschate‐Fischer, N., & Schwille, E. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_34-1 · Cited by 8
Mascarenhas, M. F., Dübbers, F., Hoszowska, M., Köseoğlu, A., Karakasheva, R., Topal, A. B., Izydorczyk, D., & Lemoine, J. E. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01677 · Cited by 7
“In addition, we will use the ratio of indirect effect to total effect (Wen and Fan, 2015) as additional indicator.”
MethodBottomley, J. S., Campbell, K. W., Feigelman, W., Schamber, E. L., & Rheingold, A. A. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.02.102 · Cited by 7
Lin, Y., Mason, D., Hirsch, C. R., & Happe, F. G. E. (2024) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-024-06310-9 · Cited by 6
“The final effect size of each indirect effect was examined by P M - the fraction of the indirect effect divided by the total effect (Wen & Fan, 2015 ).”
Wu, N., & Lin, B. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123459 · Cited by 6
Effect size measure for mediation analysis with a multicategorical predictor
Cao, Z., Cham, H., Stiver, J., & Mindt, M. R. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101440 · Cited by 6
“Wen (2015) have since added a desideratum that (d) the function of the effect size measure should be a monotonic representation, either in raw or absolute form, of the quantified effect.”
BackgroundIssler, T. C., de Sá, D. S. F., Michael, T., & Schäfer, S. K. (2023) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.3227 · Cited by 8
Shou, T., Li, K., Li, Y., Ni, Y., Lu, D., & Wei, J. (2024) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128392 · Cited by 6
Neuroticism and depression: a moderated mediation model of secure peer attachment and blindness
Lu, A., Zhang, M., Li, M., Zhang, Y., & ZHANG, J. (2019) · Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health · doi:10.2989/17280583.2019.1608829 · Cited by 6
“We conducted causal mediation analyses using the analytic models for mediation proposed by Baron and Kenny (1986) as well as Wen and Fan (2015).”
MethodAn Equivalence Testing Approach for Evaluating Substantial Mediation
Beribisky, N., Mara, C. A., & Cribbie, R. A. (2020) · The Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.16.4.p424 · Cited by 7
“To date, there has not been consensus regarding the best way to quantify effect sizes for mediation (Preacher & Kelley, 2011; Wen & Fan, 2015).”
BackgroundOrme, W. H., Kapoor, S., Frueh, B. C., Allen, J. G., Fowler, J. C., & Madan, A. (2021) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.2021.1930427 · Cited by 8
“Multiple researchers and statisticians have also noted the limitations of calculating effect sizes for mediation and have recommended caution in interpreting these too rigidly (Preacher & Kelley, 2011; Wen & Fan, 2015).”
BackgroundAnwar, F. (2022) · Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation · doi:10.14744/ejmi.2022.73988 · Cited by 6
“The ratio between direct and indirect effects was used as a measure of the effect size of mediational paths, in accordance with the recommendation by Wen and Fan.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe effects of school climate on students’ reading achievement
Pamularsih, N. (2022) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100375 · Cited by 6
İşyeri Zorbalığı ve İş Tatmininin İş Stresi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Otel İşletmelerinde Bir Araştırma
OFLAZ, M., & Polat, E. (2023) · Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.32572/guntad.1238106 · Cited by 6
Hildebrand-Burke, C., Davey, C. G., Gwini, S. M., Catania, L., & Kazantzis, N. (2023) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2023.2267166 · Cited by 6
“Previous studies have suggested differing options for interpreting effect sizes in indirect mediation models (Preacher & Kelley, 2011; Wen & Fan, 2015).”
BackgroundTrent, E. S., Viana, A., Raines, E. M., Woodward, E. C., Zvolensky, M. J., & Candelari, A. E. (2019) · Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0000000000001058 · Cited by 5
“Following recommendations (Wen and Fan, 2015), the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect (i.e., PM, or mediation ratio; Ditlevsen et al., 2005) is reported as a measure of effect size for significant indirect effects.”
BackgroundCascia, J., & Barr, J. J. (2020) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103779 · Cited by 6
Nguyen, T. T. H., Phan, G. Q., Pham, V. K., & Bùi, H. M. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-44-313776-1.00263-4 · Cited by 6
Wang, J., Zhou, G., Guo, J., Sun, X., & Sun, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1435432 · Cited by 7
“A significant correlation was found between formative assessment, psychological empowerment, positive academic emotions, and learning autonomy of medical students (Table 1), and the results supported conducting a further mediating effects analysis (69).”
ResultRuiz-Ortiz, R. M., Carreras, R., del Puerto‐Golzarri, N., & Muñoz, J. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1405389 · Cited by 7
Nan, W., & Lin, B. (2026) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-025-00812-w · Cited by 5
“We strictly follow standardized mediation testing methods, as described in Wen and Fan (2015), Fang et al. (2024), and related studies.”
Black, J. E., Oberstein-Allen, M., & Barnes, J. (2019) · Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion · doi:10.1558/jcsr.37491 · Cited by 5
Empathy and Prosocial Behavior in Adolescent Offenders: The Mediating Role of Rational Decisions
Cardona-Isaza, A. D. J., Barrón, R. G., & Montoya‐Castilla, I. (2023) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231202844 · Cited by 5
“The effect size of mediation is reported through the beta value (Wen & Fan, 2015).”
BackgroundÁlvarez-Turrado, B., Falla, D., & Romera, E. M. (2024) · Youth & Society · doi:10.1177/0044118x241306114 · Cited by 6
“Finally, to calculate the mediation effect, we used the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect (Wen & Fan, 2015).”
Gordon, D. S., & Birney, M. E. (2025) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12662 · Cited by 5
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms Among Trauma-Exposed Inpatient Adolescents
Viana, A. G., Candelari, A. E., Raines, E. M., Woodward, E. C., Paulus, D. J., Berenz, E. C., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2017) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0000000000000737 · Cited by 5
“In addition, after recent recommendations (Wen and Fan, 2015), the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect (i.”
BackgroundGalić, Z., Ružojčić, M., Jerneić, Ž., & Grabovac, M. T. (2018) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2018.1455686 · Cited by 5
“Following recommendations of Wen and Fan (2015), alongside unstandardized indirect effects, in both studies we report standardized indirect effects and the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect.”
Walters, G. D. (2019) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2019.1597322 · Cited by 5
“Wen and Fan (2015) note that popular mediation effect size measures like ĸ 2 (Preacher and Kelley 2011) and the R 2 indices proposed by MacKinnon (2008) should not be used because they are nonmonotonic and tend to produce misleading results.”
BackgroundKern, B. D., Ellison, D. W., Killian, C. M., & Widmer, F. (2020) · Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science · doi:10.1080/1091367x.2020.1760870 · Cited by 8
“Effect sizes were calculated for the structural model by comparing the ratio of indirect to direct effects (RM) for each of the TSQ constructs (Wen & Fan, 2015) with teachers’ intent to remain teaching (IRT).”
MethodLewis, N., & Sznitman, S. R. (2022) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.2022.2031355 · Cited by 5
“We report standardized bootstrapped coefficients and confidence intervals as measures of indirect effects (see Wen and Fan 2015).”
MethodRauwolf, P. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3946 · Cited by 9
García-Carrera, P., García-Segura, S., & Falla, D. (2023) · Revista Complutense de Educación · doi:10.5209/rced.79311 · Cited by 5
Hosch, A., Swanson, B., Harris, J. L., Oleson, J., Hazeltine, E., & Petersen, I. T. (2024) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-023-01162-w · Cited by 5
“…of the indirect effect, (2) the proportion of the effect that was mediated ( P M ), which is the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect (Wen & Fan, 2015), and (3) the proportion of variance in externalizing problems that was accounted for jointly by N2 amplitudes and inhibitory control…”
da Rocha, C. G., Jopp, D. S., Hoffman, A., Falciola, J., Cavalli, S., Herrmann, F. R., Röcke, C., Verloo, H., Ribeiro, O. M. P. L., & von Gunten, A. (2025) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100071 · Cited by 4
Hu, S., & Wang, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1006957 · Cited by 4
Education, Competence Development and Career Trajectories
Weinert, S., Blossfeld, G. J., & Blossfeld, H. (2023) · Methodology of educational measurement and assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27007-9 · Cited by 30
Wang, H., Liu, X., Zeng, Z., Liu, S., Yang, Q., Qi, Q., Wu, T., & Hu, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1325436 · Cited by 4
Blendermann, M., Breaux, R., Fried, E. I., Naragon‐Gainey, K., Starr, L. R., Stewart, J. G., Teachman, B. A., & Hallion, L. S. (2025) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2025.01.004 · Cited by 4
Sexual disgust sensitivity mediates the sex difference in support of censoring hate speech
Zhang, J. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.028 · Cited by 4
Peixoto, M. M., & Cunha, O. S. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04782-z · Cited by 4
“The percentage of the total mediation effect was calculated (Shrout & Bolger, 2002 ), which is a preferable interpretation according to Wen and Fan (2015).”
Teoh, K. (2018) · BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) · doi:10.18743/pub.00040322 · Cited by 4
Zainal, N. H., & Newman, M. G. (2024) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1750 · Cited by 3
“The effect size was calculated as the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect [66].”
BackgroundChen, X., Zhou, Z., & Padilla, A. M. (2026) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10092-6 · Cited by 3
“In meta-analysis, effect-size is a core component to describe the strength, direction and magnitude of an effect; it offers a standardized way for us to compare individual results from a multitude of different studies (He et al., 2019; Wen & Fan, 2015).”
Methodological research on hypothesis test and related issues in China’s mainland from 2001 to 2020
Zhonglin, W. E. N., Jinyan, X. I. E., Fang, J., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2022.01667 · Cited by 3
Self-citationHildebrandt, M. K., Noack, J., Wuellhorst, R., Endraß, T., & Jauk, E. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-05718-y · Cited by 3
“Approximately one third of the total effect was explained by the indirect effect (P ̂ M = 0.30; [71]).”
BackgroundInfluentialWang, M., Xue, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, Y., & Chen, Y. H. (2024) · Asian Journal of Technology Innovation · doi:10.1080/19761597.2024.2367763 · Cited by 3
“Second, we construct an intermediary model (Wen & Fan, 2015) that empirically tests and clarifies the influence mechanism of entrepreneurship in the new era on the improvement of GIE in the manufacturing industry.”
Zainal, N. H., & Newman, M. G. (2024) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291724001958 · Cited by 4
“Effect size was calculated as proportion of the indirect effect in relation to the total effect (Wen & Fan, 2015).”
MethodLopes, E. L., Vieira, V. A., & Herrero, E. (2025) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2476 · Cited by 3
Meyer, J., Schmidt, F. T. C., Fleckenstein, J., & Köller, O. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12543 · Cited by 4
How does the Chinese digital transformation of enterprises affect the auditor switch?
Liang, R. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302013 · Cited by 3
“Furthermore, This paper use the method and procedure of Wen (2015) for reference to test the mediating effect [47].”
MethodXu, D., Qi, P., He, Q., Shan, D., Yang, G., Yang, H., Liu, P., Liang, H., Lei, S., Guo, F., et al. (2024) · American Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1093/ajh/hpae155 · Cited by 3
Impacto del ciberostracismo sobre la ansiedad social y uso de Internet en estudiantes universitarios
López-Ráez, C., Falla, D., & Romera, E. M. (2025) · Educación XX1 · doi:10.5944/educxx1.39706 · Cited by 3
“Por último, se calculó el efecto de mediación a través de la relación entre el efecto indirecto y el total (Wen & Fan, 2015 ).”
Seems Fair to Me: Dyadic Leader Consensus Mediates Fairness and Group Performance
Gruda, D., McCleskey, J. A., & Berríos, R. (2017) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496417740636 · Cited by 4
“The indirect effect was reported using the proportion of the total effect accounted for by the indirect effect (Wen & Fan, 2015), and kappa-squared effect size (Preacher & Kelley, 2011).”
MethodExecutive function capacity links future thinking and exercise intent
Simmons, C. S., Schmidt, A., Lancaster, B. D., & Allen, J. V. (2021) · Applied Neuropsychology Child · doi:10.1080/21622965.2021.1960529 · Cited by 2
“The PM effect size, or the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect, was 0.45 (Wen & Fan, 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialReactions to Negative Feedback: The Role of Resiliency and Implications for Counterproductivity
Daljeet, K. N., Feeney, J. R., & Goffin, R. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management · doi:10.21818/001c.38519 · Cited by 3
Molinaro, D., González‐Romá, V., & Spagnoli, P. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07403-z · Cited by 4
“…computed an effect size measure of the observed indirect effects, the completely standardized indirect effects ( ab cs ) (Preacher & Kelley, 2011 ; Wen & Fan, 2015 ); ab cs is computed by multiplying the standardized structural coef - ficients involved in the mediated relationship; that is, in a…”
Li, Y., Lin, S., Li, S., Li, X., Cui, J., Qiu, Z., Cui, X., & Chen, J. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08825-5 · Cited by 2
“( Wen & Fan, 2015 ).”
Polat, E., & Ödemiş, M. (2023) · GSI Journals Serie A Advancements in Tourism Recreation and Sports Sciences · doi:10.53353/atrss.1175041 · Cited by 2
Capps, R. E., Wilson, E. D., Evans, S. W., Allan, D. M., & Langberg, J. M. (2023) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/10870547231159911 · Cited by 2
“For significant indirect effects, the ratio of indirect effects to total effects (Pm) is reported to provide information about the size of the effect (Wen & Fan, 2015).”
BackgroundCausal definitions versus casual estimation: Reply to Valente et al. (2022).
Brandt, H. (2024) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000544 · Cited by 2
Cotton, M. R., Conroy, H. E., Silva, K., Amarneh, D. Y., Zvolensky, M. J., Obasi, E. M., & Viana, A. G. (2025) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/00957984251358622 · Cited by 2
“Per recent recommendations, the proportion mediated (P M ), or the ratio of indirect effect to total effect, was calculated as a measure of effect size for signi fi cant indirect effects (Wen & Fan, 2015).”
Fear of Covid-19 and Online Shopping Intention: the Mediating Role Online Shopping Convenience
Erdogan, E., Griffiths, M. D., & Çatı, K. (2023) · International Journal of Business & Management Studies · doi:10.56734/ijbms.v4n12a8 · Cited by 2
Walters, G. D. (2018) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-018-9670-x · Cited by 2
Fite, R. E., Forrest, L. N., Berlin, G. S., Gonzales, J. P., & Magee, J. C. (2021) · Mental Health Religion & Culture · doi:10.1080/13674676.2021.1988910 · Cited by 1
“The effect size for the indirect effect was indicated by computing the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect (Wen & Fan, 2015).”
Gómez, A., Mersky, J. P., Lee, C. P., Zhang, L., Shlafer, R. J., & Jackson, D. B. (2023) · Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal · doi:10.1007/s10560-023-00924-1 · Cited by 1
“An analysis of the proportion mediated, an approximation of effect size in mediation models (Alwin & Hauser, 1975; MacKinnon et al., 2007; Wen & Fan, 2015), indicated approximately 61.5% of the total effect of maternal incarceration on child social–emotional development was explained by the…”
InfluentialYu, R., & Hu, J. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-2446-2_56 · Cited by 1
Kelso, K. C., & Grös, D. F. (2024) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-024-10157-w · Cited by 1
“For incon - sistent mediation, as the ratio of indirect and direct effects is not considered an appropriate effect size (Wen & Fan, 2015), the standardized indirect effect, which is considered directly interpretable, was reported (Preacher & Kelly, 2011).”
Ouyang, J., Jiang, Z., Shi, D., Pan, J., & Pan, S. (2025) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2025.2450782 · Cited by 1
“…analysis (Hoshino et al., 2006; Leite et al., 2019), presents a promising avenue for complementing LCM. Mediation and moderation also are widely adopted in multiple disciplines to excavate the internal mechanism and external factors (Ozkok et al., 2022; Selig & Preacher, 2009; Wen & Fan, 2015).”
Duddeck, L., Schulz, A., Renneberg, B., Berger, T., & Boettcher, J. (2025) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2025.2521126 · Cited by 1
“The ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect (Wen & Fan, 2015) assessed the magnitude.”
The impact of ride-hailing services on traffic congestion: quasi-experimental evidence from China
Wang, Z.-L., Lin, Y., & Yang, J. (2025) · Transportation letters · doi:10.1080/19427867.2025.2570223 · Cited by 1
“Mediation and suppression effects are both types of indirect effects, together discussing the role of a third variable in connecting the independent variable and the dependent variable (Mathieu and Taylor 2006; Wen and Fan 2015).”
Cue-Reactivity in Poker-Machine Gamblers: State Mindfulness and Cue-Reactive Urge to Gamble
Adams, A. L., & Rock, A. J. (2025) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-025-10432-9 · Cited by 1
“Due to a mathematical error, kappa squared is no longer recommended as a measure of effect size in mediation (Wen & Fan, 2015 ).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Wen, Z., & Fan, X.
- Affiliations
- South China Normal University (CN)
- University of Macau (MO)
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-203
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2155202060
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 25.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2015-05-11)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271116 and 31400909)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- indirect effects, rank preservation, monotonicity, multiple mediation, effect size measures, mediation analysis
- MeSH terms
- Behavioral Sciences, Humans, Statistics as Topic, Models, Statistical, Confidence Intervals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review