The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monotonicity of effect sizes: questioning kappa-squared as mediation effect size measure
Abstract
Mediation analysis is important for research in psychology and other social and behavioral sciences. Great progress has been made in testing mediation effects and in constructing their confidence intervals. Mediation effect sizes have also been considered. Preacher and Kelley (2011) proposed and recommended κ² as an effect size measure for a mediation effect. In this article, we argue that κ² is not an appropriate effect size measure for mediation models, because of its lack of the property of rank preservation (e.g., the magnitude of κ² may decrease when the mediation effect that κ² represents increases). Furthermore, κ² can lead to paradoxical results in multiple mediation models. We show that the problem of κ² is due to (a) the improper calculation of the maximum possible value of the indirect effect, and (b) mathematically, the maximum possible indirect effect is infinity, implying that the definition of κ² is mathematically incorrect. At this time, it appears that the traditional mediation effect size measure PM (the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect), together with some other statistical information, should be preferred for basic mediation models. But for inconsistent mediation models where the indirect effect and the direct effect have opposite signs, the situation is less clear. Other considerations and suggestions for future research are also discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Three single-arm trials showed that increased global trait mindfulness mediated the impact of MBIs on reduction in GAD severity [8] and perceived stress [9-11]”
In the citing paper
“evidence that MBIs better equipped people with GAD and depression with the skills to perceive emotions and thoughts as transient occurrences rather than personally associating with them – a process called “decentering” – than controls [8, 95]”
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/651257 · Cited by 12,583
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
Hayes, A. F. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903310360 · Cited by 9,757
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83 · Cited by 9,406
Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators
Hedges, L. V. (1981) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164588 · Cited by 5,695
Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis
MacKinnon, D. P. (2012) · doi:10.4324/9780203809556 · Cited by 5,618
Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1023/a:1026595011371 · Cited by 4,188
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–350 of 350
Wartenberg, G., Donker, M. H., Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., & Mainhard, T. (2025) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102430 · Cited by 5
Kovalchuk, L. S., González‐Romá, V., Balducci, C., Molinaro, D., & Spagnoli, P. (2025) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2025.2601226 · Cited by 1
“As a measure of effect size for the indirect effect, we computed the completely standardized indirect effect (Preacher & Kelley, 2011; Wen & Fan, 2015).”
Peña‐Jorquera, H., Martínez‐Flores, R., Espinoza‐Puelles, J. P., Landaeta‐Díaz, L., López‐Gil, J. F., & Cristi‐Montero, C. (2026) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-025-03884-7 · Cited by 1
“When the indirect effect was significant, the proportion mediated was calculated using the formula ((a*b)/c)*100, which estimates the percentage of the total effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable that is explained by the mediating variable [37 ].”
Huang, H., Zeigler‐Hill, V., & Li, H. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104888 · Cited by 1
Costello, M. A., Austin, L., Parnes, M. F., Conroy, K., Albright, M. G., Spurrell, W., Schwartz, S. E. O., & Schuster, R. M. (2026) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108836 · Cited by 2
Boffa, J. W., Short, N. A., Albanese, B. J., Dillon, K. H., Kearns, J. C., & Schmidt, N. B. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.121581 · Cited by 1
Huang, N., Fan, H., & Zhu, R. (2026) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.70760 · Cited by 1
Ndoromo, O. (2018) · Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation · doi:10.14744/ejmi.2018.35220 · Cited by 1
Arrogi, A., Schotte, A., Bogaerts, A., Boen, F., & Seghers, J. (2019) · Journal of Physical Activity and Health · doi:10.1123/jpah.2018-0148 · Cited by 1
Koscinski, B., & Allan, N. P. (2022) · Psychopathology · doi:10.1159/000527300 · Cited by 1
DeVries, J. M., Szardenings, C., Doebler, P., & Gebhardt, M. (2023) · Methodology of educational measurement and assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27007-9_6 · Cited by 1
Zhuo, Y., Chen, X., Liu, J., & Jiang, X. (2023) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/00111287231207376 · Cited by 1
“Although researchers have not reached a consensus on the best statistic to measure the effect size of an indirect effect, Wen and Fan (2015) suggest that the ratio of an indirect to the total effect should be preferred over other measures.”
Walters, G. (2019) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2019.1651463 · Cited by 2
Zhan, S., Zhang, L., Li, X., & Wu, Y. (2023) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12627 · Cited by 1
Carrying Disaster Lightly: Assessment of Resilience in Two Populations with Psychopathic Features
Baglole, J. S. (2019) · doi:10.22215/etd/2019-13846 · Cited by 1
Schaeuffele, C., Bär, J., Buengener, I., Grafiadeli, R., Heuthaler, E., Strieder, J., Ziehn, P., Knaevelsrud, C., Renneberg, B., & Boettcher, J. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/fs4x8 · Cited by 1
The Role of Personality in Language Learning
Mrzyglod, E., Esposito, A., Fabbro, A., Fabbro, F., Crescentini, C., & Matiz, A. (2026) · Psychology of Language and Communication · doi:10.58734/plc-2026-0004
Psychological flexibility, distress, and coping in ovarian cancer survivors.
Telles, R., Hosch, A., Pennington, K. P., Schlumbrecht, M., McGregor, B. A., Heron, L., Zia, S., Noble, A., Goodheart, M. J., Noonan, M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347332.2025.2588632
Mixed emotions : an investigation of their source, induction and consequences for well-being
Berríos, R. (2015) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Whitson, S. (2017) · Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey)
Executive function, intent to exercise, and consideration of future consequences: A mediation model
Simmons, C. S. (2019) · ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)
Saldana, D. G. (2021) · CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)
Partoví, R., Calzada, E. J., Roche, K. M., Little, T. D., & Roman, M. J. S. (2022) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12719
Positive Relationships Mediate the Bidirectional Connections Between Depression and Anxiety SymptomsPreprint
Barber, K. E., Tong, Y. A., & Newman, M. G. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gjqn8
Hill, P. J. (2022) · Cronfa (Swansea University) · doi:10.23889/suthesis.60117
Cohen, V., Clark, S. M., Saker, K. M., Dunn, S. E., Watson‐Singleton, N. N., & Kaslow, N. J. (2024) · Journal of African American Studies · doi:10.1007/s12111-024-09671-8
“(http:// pngu. mgh. harva rd. edu/ ~purce ll/ gpc/) In accord with recommended requirements for a medium effect size in mediation analysis (Wen & Fan, 2015), our a priori power analysis had a specified power of 0.95, alpha level of 0.05, and an effect size of 0.09.”
InfluentialPieters, R. G. M. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5050418
Zhou, P., Yang, Z., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2025.2531417
“Controlling for the two perceptions dropped the correlation between trait fearfulness and support for restriction by P M (i.e., proportion mediated) = 75.9% (Wen & Fan, 2015).”
Influentialhu, D., & Wang, S. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5394245
A Time for Creativity Too? How Past‐Versus Future‐Oriented Thinking Facilitates Creativity
Koh, B., & Leung, A. K. ‐. (2025) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.70062
Kyslík, F., Janoušek, O., Květoň, P., & Juřík, V. (2025) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2025.2573472
Moderators and Mediators of the Relationship Between Social Support and Readiness To Change in OCD
King, K., Kichuk, S. A., Pittenger, C., & Zaboski, B. A. (2025) · Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy · doi:10.1007/s10879-025-09692-8
“Effect sizes are reported as the standardized beta (β) coefficient for regression models; no effect statistic was reported for the mediation analysis because of flaws with such statistics for inconsistent mediation or non-significant results (Wen & Fan, 2015).”
Wigg, L., Chao, M., & Li, W. W. (2025) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-025-02593-4
Bedaso, A., Adams, J., Peng, W., & Sibbritt, D. W. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23084214
Hildebrandt, M. K., Noack, J., Wuellhorst, R., Endraß, T., & Jauk, E. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25608737
Bedaso, A., Adams, J., Peng, W., & Sibbritt, D. W. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23084211
Delgado-Rodríguez, R., Linares, R., & Padilla, M. M. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20454896
Effect size measures in mediation analysis: New and Old, What is Good?
Yuan, K., Wang, Y., & Liu, H. (2025) · Methods in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.metip.2025.100224
Hu, S., & Wang, S. (2026) · International Journal of Financial Studies · doi:10.3390/ijfs14010023
“To test the channels, we use the mediating effects methods to verify the channels of environmental uncertainty on the stock mispricing (Wen & Fan, 2015), and the models we used are described in Equations (6) and (7). where MED is the mediating variable, earnings manipulation ( EM ) and investor…”
Zhou, B., & Xin, Z. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08529-w
“Following the recommendations of Wen and Fan ( 2015 ), we calculated the effect size index for the indirect effect, P M , defined as the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect.”
Soh, C. P., Szuhany, K. L., & Zainal, N. H. (2026) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.70232 · Cited by 1
“Mediation effect sizes were the proportion of the indirect effect ( a × b ) relative to the total effect ( c = a × b + c ') (Preacher and Kelley 2011; Wen and Fan 2015).”
Bogdanić, V., González‐Romá, V., Tomás-Marco, I., Nübold, A., & Hernández, A. (2026) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2026.10028
“To estimate the corresponding effect sizes, we computed the completely standardized indirect “ effect ” ( ab cs ) because it is independent from sample size and easy to interpret (Wen & Fan, 2015).”
Generational Difference in Internet Use and Moral Evaluation: The Mediating Role of Moral Anomie
Yu, L., & Sultan, M. T. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261431377
Sandoval-Correa, D., Panduro-Rengifo, Y., Gutierrez-Cieza, R., Turpo, J. A., & Llanos, J. J. M. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1914061
Lemoine, J. E., Izydorczyk, D., Dübbers, F., Hoszowska, M., Karakasheva, R., Köseoğlu, A., Mascarenhas, M. F., & Topal, A. B. (2026) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ijppm-08-2025-0832
Qi, X., Ko, E., Ruan, J., Jung, J. H., Leong, I. T., Pei, Y., Mao, W., Zheng, Y., Mittelman, M. S., & Wu, B. (2026) · International Journal of Nursing Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2026.08.009
“We report the proportion of the total effect mediated with percentile bootstrap CI s; as a ratio estimator, this quantity becomes unstable when the total effect is modest, and its intervals should be read accordingly [50,51].”
Kim, J., & Kwon, K. Y. (2026) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcag030
Li, H., Li, H., Yue, B., Yin, M., & Cao, S. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18189659
Zhao, Y., Yang, X., Zhang, J., 蔡海生, Zhang, H., & Xi, G. (2026) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f17111266
Metadata
- Authors
- Wen, Z., & Fan, X.
- Affiliations
- South China Normal University (CN)
- University of Macau (MO)
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-203
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2155202060
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 25.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2015-05-11)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271116 and 31400909)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- indirect effects, rank preservation, monotonicity, multiple mediation, effect size measures, mediation analysis
- MeSH terms
- Behavioral Sciences, Humans, Statistics as Topic, Models, Statistical, Confidence Intervals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review