Cited by 91Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Disorganized attachment and personality functioning in adults: A latent class analysis.

Open access
Beeney, Joseph E., Wright, Aidan G. C., Stepp, Stephanie D., Hallquist, Michael N., Lazarus, Sophie A., Beeney, Julie R. S., Scott, Lori N., Pilkonis, Paul A.·2017·Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

Abstract

Though researchers have attended to disorganized attachment in infants and children, they have infrequently focused on the character of disorganized attachment in adults. In this study, we aimed to identify clusters of participants based on attachment levels and styles, seeking to better delineate severity and stylistic differences in disorganized attachment than has been previously articulated. We used a new assessment approach focused on a hierarchy of attachment organization, including secure, insecure (dismissive and preoccupied), rigid-controlling (hostile control and compulsive caregiving), and disorganized (contradictory, impoverished, and unresolved) levels of attachment. Clinical evaluators used information from diagnostic and attachment-based interviews to rate participants on each of these aspects of attachment. Latent class analysis (LCA) revealed a 4-class solution, including a secure (n = 33), insecure (n = 110), and 2 disorganized classes. One disorganized class (disorganized-oscillating) was characterized by elevations on contradictory and preoccupied styles (n = 77) and another (disorganized-impoverished) showed elevations on impoverished and dismissive styles (n = 53). The disorganized-oscillating class exhibited elevated personality disorder (PD) severity and general symptom severity, borderline personality disorder (BPD), histrionic, and antisocial dimensional scores, and the most severe identity disturbance compared with the other classes. The impoverished-dismissive class exhibited the highest avoidant and schizoid PD dimensional scores of the classes, and higher PD severity compared with the insecure and secure classes. These results highlight the possibility of identifying distinct classes of attachment organization, differentiated both by aspects of severity and interpersonal style. They also shed light on the manifestation of attachment disorganization in adults. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/per0000184

Cites

46 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Beeney J Stepp SD Hallquist MN Scott LN Wright AGC Ellison WD Pilkonis PA Attachment and Social Cognition in Borderline Personality Disorder: Specificity in Relation to Antisocial and Avoidant Personality Disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment 2015 6 3 doi:10.1037/per0000110 PMC4509943 25705979 · DOI
  2. Solomon J George C Solomon J George C The Disorganized Attachment-Caregiving System: The Origins of Caregiver Helplessness. Disorganized attachment and caregiving 2011 427 Guilford Press New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beeney, J. E., Wright, A. G. C., Stepp, S. D., Hallquist, M. N., Lazarus, S. A., Beeney, J. R. S., Scott, L. N., & Pilkonis, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment
Published
2017-07
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
206-216
ISSN
  • 1949-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-2723
OpenAlex
W2330263000
Cited by
91
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (F32 MH102895, L30 MH101760, R01 MH05688)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
disorganized attachment, adult attachment, attachment organization, attachment styles, personality disorder severity, borderline personality disorder, identity disturbance, attachment avoidance, histrionic personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder
MeSH terms
Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Personality Disorders, Social Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review