Cited by 24Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Dating violence victimization and borderline personality pathology: Temporal associations from late adolescence to early adulthood.

Open access
Vanwoerden, Salome, Leavitt, Jacob, Gallagher, Matthew W., Temple, Jeff R., Sharp, Carla·2019·Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

Abstract

Borderline personality pathology is a serious mental illness characterized by pervasive interpersonal deficits that onset during adolescence. Risk factors for borderline personality pathology include maladaptive interpersonal dynamics within attachment relationships. Given the shift toward emphasizing romantic relationships during adolescence as an important attachment relationship with implications for healthy development, the current study aimed to evaluate the longitudinal and reciprocal relations between victimization in dating relationships and borderline pathology in the transition from late adolescence to early adulthood. A large sample of high school daters (N = 818; 58% female; Mage = 16.10 years, SDage = .78) were recruited to complete annual assessments of borderline personality features and dating violence victimization across 5 years. Results of a cross-lagged panel model revealed that primarily among girls, borderline features predicted increased levels of relational, psychological, and physical violence, whereas psychological and sexual violence predicted greater borderline features. The current findings provide the first evidence of a longitudinal association between victimization and borderline pathology in adolescence and suggest, particularly among girls, that interventions for borderline features have important implications for reducing dating violence victimization among adolescents and young adults. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/per0000324

Cites

56 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adults with BPD and adolescents with BPD features also are at increased risk for abuse or re-victimization as adults and for cumulative polyvictimization across the lifespan.

    “Adults with BPD [14, 96, 98, 118, 121] and adolescents with BPD features [89, 154, 182] also are at increased risk for abuse or re-victimization as adults and for cumulative polyvictimization across the lifespan.”

    From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [182]

    The Abstract and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) report that borderline features in adolescents, particularly females, predicted greater dating-violence victimization during the study’s transition into young adulthood. The paper does not establish cumulative polyvictimization across the lifespan, and its own longitudinal findings do not concern adults diagnosed with BPD. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Browne MW, & Cudeck R (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit In Bollen KA & Long JS, Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136– 162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  2. Collins WA, & Sroufe LA (1999). Capacity for intimate relationships In Furman Wyndol, Brown BB, & Feiring C (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 125– 147). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Kline RB (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2011 (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
  4. Linehan MM (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder (Vol. xvii). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
  5. Muthén LK, & Muthén BO (n.d.). MPlus User’s Guide. Eighth Edition. Muthen & Muthen.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vanwoerden, S., Leavitt, J., Gallagher, M. W., Temple, J. R., & Sharp, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Venue
Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment
Published
2019-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
132-142
ISSN
  • 1949-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-2723
OpenAlex
W2920068321
Cited by
24
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23HD059916)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
dating violence victimization, borderline personality traits, romantic relationships, adolescence, early adulthood, attachment relationships, sexual violence, psychological violence, physical violence, bidirectional relationship, gender differences
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Adolescent, Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Sex Offenses, Crime Victims, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review