CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 314Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Psychiatry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conceptualizations, assessments, and implications of personal recovery in mental illness: A scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

van Weeghel, Jaap, van Zelst, Catherine, Boertien, Dienke, Hasson-Ohayon, Ilanit·2019·Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
DOI 10.1037/prj0000356
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recovery, defined as a personal process of living with mental illness, has become a prominent concept in mental health care. We aimed to map the state of the art of conceptualizing recovery, its promoting and impeding factors, recovery-oriented practice, and the assessment of recovery. METHOD: A scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses was performed. Systematic searches were conducted, supplemented with hand-searching in reference lists. RESULTS: Of 228 articles that were identified and 33 that were reviewed, a total of 25 were included. This review showed that the CHIME conceptual framework for personal recovery is widely endorsed, containing the elements of connectedness, hope and optimism, identity, meaning in life, and empowerment. Although personal recovery first and foremost starts from individual preferences, the CHIME framework should be adapted according to culture and unique population characteristics. "Difficulties and trauma" should be added, and the person's choice, risk taking, and coping with challenges should be emphasized. Barriers to recovery are stigma and negative effects of mental health services and medication. Facilitators of recovery include spirituality, personal agency, and social support. Recovery-focused interventions, in which peer providers are involved, enhance recovery, hope, and empowerment. For assessing recovery outcomes, multiple instruments are accepted as methodologically sound. CONCLUSIONS: Personal recovery is conceptualized as complementary to clinical recovery and represents processes rather than outcomes. Additional work is needed to bridge the gap between the concept of recovery-oriented practice and routinely provided interventions. A broad framework of recovery is needed, and more research is needed into the working mechanisms of personal recovery processes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/prj0000356

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 60 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 314

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
van Weeghel, J., van Zelst, C., Boertien, D., & Hasson-Ohayon, I.
ORCID
Hasson-Ohayon, Ilanit
Venue
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2019-06
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
169-181
ISSN
  • 1095-158X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-3126
DOI
10.1037/prj0000356
OpenAlex
W2921864950
Cited by
314
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 7
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
personal recovery, mental illness, CHIME framework, recovery-oriented care, stigma, peer support, spirituality, social support, empowerment, hope, clinical recovery
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Mental Disorders, Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review