CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 484Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionEmotions and Moral BehaviorCultural Differences and Values

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Awe, the diminished self, and collective engagement: Universals and cultural variations in the small self

Bai, Yang, Maruskin, Laura A., Chen, Serena, Gordon, Amie M., Stellar, Jennifer E., McNeil, Galen D., Peng, Kaiping, Keltner, Dacher·2017·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
DOI 10.1037/pspa0000087
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Awe has been theorized as a collective emotion, one that enables individuals to integrate into social collectives. In keeping with this theorizing, we propose that awe diminishes the sense of self and shifts attention away from individual interests and concerns. In testing this hypothesis across 6 studies (N = 2137), we first validate pictorial and verbal measures of the small self; we then document that daily, in vivo, and lab experiences of awe, but not other positive emotions, diminish the sense of the self. These findings were observed across collectivist and individualistic cultures, but also varied across cultures in magnitude and content. Evidence from the last 2 studies showed that the influence of awe upon the small self accounted for increases in collective engagement, fitting with claims that awe promotes integration into social groups. Discussion focused on how the small self might mediate the effects of awe on collective cognition and behavior, the need to study more negatively valenced varieties of awe, and other potential cultural variations of the small self. (PsycINFO Database Record

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pspa0000087

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 130 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 484

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bai, Y., Maruskin, L. A., Chen, S., Gordon, A. M., Stellar, J. E., McNeil, G. D., Peng, K., & Keltner, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2017-08
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
185-209
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
DOI
10.1037/pspa0000087
OpenAlex
W2613687067
Cited by
476
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 20
FWCI
30.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation (38671)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
awe, collective engagement, collective emotions, cultural variation, social integration, positive emotions, self-concept
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, China, Cognition, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Ego, Emotions, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Middle Aged, Self Concept, United States, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review