Cited by 21Stress and Burnout ResearchEmotional Labor in ProfessionsTechnostress in Professional Settings

Awe Versus Aww: The Effectiveness of Two Kinds of Positive Emotional Stimulation on Stress Reduction for Online Content Moderators

Open access
Cook, Christine L., Cai, Jie, Wohn, Donghee Yvette·2022·Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

When people have the freedom to create and post content on the internet, particularly anonymously, they do not always respect the rules and regulations of the websites on which they post, leaving other unsuspecting users vulnerable to sexism, racism, threats, and other unacceptable content in their daily cyberspace diet. However, content moderators witness the worst of humanity on a daily basis in place of the average netizen. This takes its toll on moderators, causing stress, fatigue, and emotional distress akin to the symptomology of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The goal of the present study was to explore whether adding positive stimuli to breaktimes-images of baby animals or beautiful, aweinspiring landscapes-could help reduce the negative side-effects of being a content moderator. To test this, we had over 300 experienced content moderators read and decide whether 200 fake text-based social media posts were acceptable or not for public consumption. Although we set out to test positive emotional stimulation, however, we actually found that it is the cumulative nature of the negative emotions that likely negates most of the effects of the intervention: the longer the person had practiced content moderation, the stronger their negative experience. Connections to compassion fatigue and how best to spend work breaks as a content moderator are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3555168

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research attempting to evaluate the impact on content moderators has largely focused on volunteer moderators.

    “research attempting to evaluate the impact on CMs has largely focused on volunteer moderators (Cook et al., 2022; Schöpke-Gonzalez et al., 2022).”
  • Existing literature suggests that exposure to other people's trauma at work is also detrimental for content moderators.

    “Existing literature suggests that this is also the case for CMs (Cook et al., 2022; Schöpke-Gonzalez et al., 2022).”
  • Academic research highlights high stress levels and fatigue in content moderators.

    “Similarly, academic research highlights high stress levels and fatigue (Cook et al., 2022)”
  • Academic research has highlighted that content reviewers experience high-stress levels, fatigue, insomnia, anxiety, low mood, increased apathy, guilt, and intrusive images as part of their everyday work.

    “Academic research has highlighted that content reviewers experience high-stress levels, fatigue, insomnia, anxiety, low mood, increased apathy, guilt, and intrusive images as part of their everyday work [18,39,45,112,168].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, C. L., Cai, J., & Wohn, D. Y.
Affiliations
  • National Chengchi University (TW)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2022-11-07
Volume
6
Issue
CSCW2
Pages
1-19
ISSN
2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308916368
Cited by
20
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1928627)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
Keywords
content moderation, stress reduction, awe, compassion fatigue, post-traumatic stress disorder, rest breaks, emotional distress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review