Cited by 21Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCognitive Functions and Memory

The role of psychological flexibility in recovery following mild traumatic brain injury

Faulkner, Josh W., Snell, Deborah L., Theadom, Alice, Mahon, Susan, Barker-Collo, Suzanne·2021·Rehabilitation Psychology

Abstract

Purpose and Objective: Psychological distress is known to contribute to recovery following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and there is a need to understand the mechanisms that contribute to this relationship. The present study examined psychological flexibility, as a hypothesized psychological mechanism, in 169 treatment-seeking adults with mTBI. Research Method/Design: Participants completed self-report measures of postconcussion symptoms, psychological distress (anxiety, stress, and depression) and functional status within four weeks of entry to an mTBI outpatient clinic. A general measure (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire), as well as a context-specific (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Acquired Brain Injury) measure of psychological flexibility were administered. Results: Simple linear regression analysis showed that psychological flexibility made a significant contribution to the prediction of postconcussion symptoms and functional status. A series of multiple mediation analyses also found that psychological flexibility had a significant indirect effect on the relationships between psychological distress and postconcussion symptoms, and functional status. The context-specific, rather than the general measure of psychological flexibility, was consistently shown to contribute to these findings. Conclusions/Implications: These results suggest that psychological flexibility is a psychological mechanism that contributes to recovery outcomes in individuals with mTBI and could therefore be an important treatment target in mTBI interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/rep0000406

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Given evidence that psychological flexibility influences mTBI outcomes and recovery, targeting this process in the ACTion-mTBI intervention may also account for the reduction in PPCS and improvement in functional status observed in this study.

    “Furthermore, given evidence that psychological flexibility influences mTBI outcomes and recovery,90 targeting this process in the ACTion-mTBI intervention may also account for the reduction in PPCS and improvement in functional status observed in this study.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faulkner, J. W., Snell, D. L., Theadom, A., Mahon, S., & Barker-Collo, S.
Affiliations
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Venue
Rehabilitation Psychology
Published
2021-11
Volume
66
Issue
4
Pages
479-490
ISSN
  • 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1544
OpenAlex
W3204316569
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Health Research Council of New Zealand (20/041)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
psychological flexibility, mild traumatic brain injury, post-concussion symptoms, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, stress, functional status, Acceptance and Action Questionnaire, mediation, recovery mechanisms, treatment goals
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Brain Concussion, Brain Injuries, Humans, Post-Concussion Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review