Cited by 52Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsEating Disorders and BehaviorsSex and Gender in Healthcare

Does atypical interoception following physical change contribute to sex differences in mental illness?

Open access
Murphy, Jennifer, Viding, Essi, Bird, Geoffrey·2019·Psychological Review

Abstract

Sex differences in the prevalence and presentation of mental illnesses are well documented. Women are more likely to experience common mental health disorders (e.g., anxiety and depression), and when they experience these conditions, they often present differently to men (e.g., women are more likely to report somatic complaints). Periods of physical and hormonal change (e.g., adolescence, pregnancy, and menopause) are particular risk periods for the development of mental illness in women. In this article, we advance the proposal that interoception (the perception of the body's internal state) is one mechanism that might explain sex differences in vulnerability to mental illness. We argue that known sex differences in interoception, whereby women, compared to men, report heightened attention to internal signals coupled with worse interoceptive accuracy, may result from the increased amount of physical and hormonal change women experience across development. Given links between interoception and mental health, we propose that sex differences in interoception may partly explain sex differences in the prevalence and presentation of certain mental illnesses. Further scrutiny of this proposal may aid our understanding of sex differences in mental illness with implications for assessment, early intervention, and the development of novel treatment approaches. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/rev0000158

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The spike in alexithymia prevalence in adolescence is consistent with the idea that interoceptive impairment represents a risk factor for, or is causally associated with, the development of psychopathology during this period.

    “This spike in alexithymia prevalence in adolescence is consistent with the idea that interoceptive impairment represents a risk factor for, or is causally associated with, the development of psychopathology during this period of development (Murphy, Brewer, et al., 2017; Murphy, Viding, et al., 2019).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Murphy, Viding, et al., 2019

  • Sensitive periods may occur later in life, for example during puberty, pregnancy and menopause, when physical changes may disrupt interoceptive signals, and perception of these signals must be adapted or relearnt.

    “Sensitive periods may also occur later in life, for example during puberty, pregnancy and menopause, when physical changes may disrupt interoceptive signals, and perception of these signals must be adapted or relearnt (Murphy, Viding, et al., 2019).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Murphy, Viding, et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Barrett, L. F., & Simmons, W. K. (2015). Interoceptive predictions in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16 (7), 419-429.
  2. Barsky, A. J., Peekna, H. M., and Borus, J. F. (2001). Somatic symptom reporting in women and men. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 16, 266-275. doi:10.1046/j.15251497.2001.016004266.x. · DOI
  3. Fuhrmann, D., Knoll, L. J., & Blakemore, S. J. (2015). Adolescence as a sensitive period of brain development. Trends in cognitive sciences, 19 (10), 558-566.
  4. Garfinkel, S. N., Tiley, C., O'Keeffe, S., Harrison, N. A., Seth, A. K., and Critchley, H. D. (2016). Discrepancies between dimensions of interoception in autism: Implications for emotion and anxiety. Biol. Psychol. 114, 117-126. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.12.003. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Hill, C. C., & Pickinpaugh, J. (2008). Physiologic changes in pregnancy. Surgical Clinics of North America, 88 (2), 391-401.
  6. Hodgkinson, E. L., Smith, D. M., & Wittkowski, A. (2014). Women's experiences of their pregnancy and postpartum body image: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 14 (1), 330.
  7. Hofmeier, S. M., Runfola, C. D., Sala, M., Gagne, D. A., Brownley, K. A., & Bulik, C. M. (2017). Body image, aging, and identity in women over 50: The Gender and Body Image (GABI) study. Journal of women & aging, 29 (1), 3-14.
  8. Khalsa, S. S., and Lapidus, R. C. (2016). Can Interoception Improve the Pragmatic Search for Biomarkers in Psychiatry? Front. Psychiatry 7, 121. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00121. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Knapp-Kline, K., & Kline, J. P. (2005). Heart rate, heart rate variability, and heartbeat detection with the method of constant stimuli: slow and steady wins the race. Biological psychology, 69 (3), 387-396.
  10. Laney, E. K., Hall, M. E. L., Anderson, T. L., & Willingham, M. M. (2015). Becoming a mother: The influence of motherhood on women's identity development. Identity, 15 (2), 126-145.
  11. Murphy, J., Brewer, R., Catmur, C., and Bird, G. (2017). Interoception and psychopathology: A developmental neuroscience perspective. Dev Cogn Neurosci 23, 45-56. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.12.006. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Paulus, M. P., & Stein, M. B. (2010). Interoception in anxiety and depression. Brain structure and Function, 214 (5-6), 451-463.
  13. Pennebaker, J. W., and Roberts, T.-A. (1992). Toward a his and hers theory of emotion: gender differences in visceral perception. J Soc Clin Psychol 11, 199-212. doi:10.1521/jscp.1992.11.3.199. · DOI
  14. Quattrocki, E., and Friston, K. (2014). Autism, oxytocin and interoception. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 47, 410-430. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.012. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Rosano, G. M., Rillo, M., Leonardo, F., Pappone, C., & Chierchia, S. L. (1997). Palpitations: what is the mechanism, and when should we treat them?. International journal of fertility and women's medicine, 42 (2), 94-100.
  16. Suschinsky, K. D., and Lalumière, M. L. (2012). Is sexual concordance related to awareness of physiological states? Arch. Sex. Behav. 41, 199-208. doi:10.1007/s10508-0129931-9. · DOI
  17. Whiteford, H. A., Ferrari, A. J., Degenhardt, L., Feigin, V., and Vos, T. (2015). The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS One 10, e0116820. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116820. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Whitehead, W. E., and Drescher, V. M. (1980). Perception of Gastric Contractions and SelfControl of Gastric Motility. Psychophysiology 17, 552-558. doi:10.1111/j.14698986.1980.tb02296.x. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, J., Viding, E., & Bird, G.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2019-10
Volume
126
Issue
5
Pages
787-789
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2966086266
Cited by
52
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council
  • Baily Thomas Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Keywords
interoception, sex differences, mental illness, interoceptive accuracy, physical changes, adolescence, pregnancy, menopause, anxiety, depression, somatic symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Sex Characteristics, Disease Transmission, Infectious, Interoception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review