Cited by 447Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Substance use and intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review.

Cafferky, Bryan M., Mendez, Marcos, Anderson, Jared R., Stith, Sandra M.·2018·Psychology of Violence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/vio0000074

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cafferky, B. M., Mendez, M., Anderson, J. R., & Stith, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Loma Linda University (US)
  • Kansas State University (US)
Venue
Psychology of Violence
Published
2018-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
110-131
ISSN
  • 2152-081X (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-0828
OpenAlex
W2519150694
Cited by
447
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
14.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Violence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
substance use, intimate partner violence, alcohol consumption, drug use, domestic violence, relationship violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review