The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When goals conflict with values: Counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli.
Open accessAbstract
Attention provides the gateway to cognition, by selecting certain stimuli for further analysis. Recent research demonstrates that whether a stimulus captures attention is not determined solely by its physical properties, but is malleable, being influenced by our previous experience of rewards obtained by attending to that stimulus. Here we show that this influence of reward learning on attention extends to task-irrelevant stimuli. In a visual search task, certain stimuli signaled the magnitude of available reward, but reward delivery was not contingent on responding to those stimuli. Indeed, any attentional capture by these critical distractor stimuli led to a reduction in the reward obtained. Nevertheless, distractors signaling large reward produced greater attentional and oculomotor capture than those signaling small reward. This counterproductive capture by task-irrelevant stimuli is important because it demonstrates how external reward structures can produce patterns of behavior that conflict with task demands, and similar processes may underlie problematic behavior directed toward real-world rewards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These studies instead demonstrated that a reward-signaling stimulus demanded attention irrespective of it being detrimental to task performance and reward payout (e.g., Le Pelley et al., 2015; Failing et al., 2015; Failing & Theeuwes, 2017).”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Le Pelley et al., 2015
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, other studies observed no such learning under conditions in which attentional suppression would have been the appropriate response that also would have led to more reward payout.”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Le Pelley et al., 2015
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A distinction between both has been demonstrated in behavioral studies (Della Libera & Chelazzi, 2009; Le Pelley et al., 2015; see also Chelazzi et al., 2013)”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Le Pelley et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
Brainard, D. H. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00357 · Cited by 20,012
The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies
Pelli, D. G. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00366 · Cited by 11,110
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670
Kapur, S. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.13 · Cited by 2,813
Attentional bias in emotional disorders.
MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. R. (1986) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.95.1.15 · Cited by 2,553
Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method
Cousineau, D. (2005) · Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042 · Cited by 1,868
Perceptual selectivity for color and form
Theeuwes, J. (1992) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211656 · Cited by 1,649
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy
Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010 · Cited by 1,557
Skinner, B. F. (1948) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0055873 · Cited by 1,456
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- In H. Davis & H. Hurwirtz (Eds.), Operant-Pavlovian Interactions (pp. 67-97). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Le Pelley, M. E. (2010). Attention and human associative learning. In C. J. Mitchell & M. E. Le Pelley (Eds.), Attention and Associative Learning: From Brain to Behaviour (pp. 187-215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The attention habit: how reward learning shapes attentional selection
Anderson, B. A. (2015) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12957 · Cited by 436
Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.
Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y · Cited by 345
“…(e.g., by depriving them of water: Seitz et al., 2009; or food: Cunningham & Egeth, 2016) suggest that state-dependent fluctuations within a single individual may also affect the 3 Several studies found an effect of reward on saccadic latencies (Le Pelley et al., 2015; Pearson et al., 2015).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAttention and associative learning in humans: An integrative review.
Le Pelley, M. E., Mitchell, C. J., Beesley, T., George, D. N., & Wills, A. J. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000064 · Cited by 329
Self-citationGrounding cognitive control in associative learning
Abrahamse, E., Braem, S., Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000047 · Cited by 276
Towards a Unitary Approach to Human Action Control
Hommel, B., & Wiers, R. W. H. J. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.09.009 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Le Pelley, M. E., Pearson, D., Griffiths, O., & Beesley, T.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 158-171
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2125474002
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 13
- FWCI
- 12.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (FT100100260)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- attentional capture, oculomotor capture, reward learning, task-irrelevant distractors, visual search, reward magnitude, counterproductive behavior, extrinsic rewards
- MeSH terms
- Problem Behavior, Adolescent, Association Learning, Attention, Color Perception, Conflict, Psychological, Cues, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Reward, Saccades, Social Values, Students, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
