Cited by 54Memory Processes and InfluencesFace Recognition and PerceptionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Knowing by heart: Visceral feedback shapes recognition memory judgments.

Fiacconi, Chris M., Peter, Erika L., Owais, Sawayra, Köhler, Stefan·2016·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

Although theories of emotion have long noted the importance of afferent feedback from the autonomic nervous system in generating feelings, there is a growing appreciation that this feedback may also play a role in shaping cognitive experiences. At present, little is known about its functional role in memory judgments. In the current study, we examined whether afferent cardiovascular feedback shapes recognition-memory decisions and experiences when previously encountered faces are being discriminated from novel ones. To investigate this possibility, we capitalized on the natural variation in baroreceptor mediated cardiovascular feedback that is associated with the cardiac cycle, synchronizing the brief presentation of memory probes during retrieval with individual heartbeats. In Experiments 1 and 2, we found that faces presented during cardiac systole (i.e., when visceral feedback is maximal) were more likely endorsed as "old" than those presented during cardiac diastole (i.e., when afferent feedback is minimal). This pattern was present for targets and lures, and held for faces with fearful or neutral expressions. Combining this manipulation with a remember/know procedure, Experiment 3 showed that the influence of afferent cardiovascular feedback is specific to trials on which participants report a feeling of familiarity without successful recollection of pertinent contextual detail. By revealing an influence of baroreceptor mediated cardiovascular feedback on familiarity, th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/xge0000164

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other background beliefs may be more innate and furnished by evolution, such as associations between interoceptive states and confidence.

    “Other background beliefs may be more innate and furnished by evolution, such as associations between interoceptive states and confidence (Allen et al. 2016, Fiacconi et al. 2016).”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Fiacconi et al. 2016

  • Interoceptive factors influence confidence judgments even if they are irrelevant to the decision at hand.

    “Other work indicates that interoceptive factors influence confidence judgments even if they are irrelevant to the decision at hand (Fiacconi et al. 2016).”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Fiacconi et al. 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fiacconi, C. M., Peter, E. L., Owais, S., & Köhler, S.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Queen's University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2016-05
Volume
145
Issue
5
Pages
559-572
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2319811303
Cited by
54
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  • Alzheimer Society London and Middlesex
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
recognition memory, afferent feedback, cardiac cycle, familiarity, recollection, remember/know procedure, face recognition (cognition), autonomic nervous system, memory judgments
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Electrocardiography, Face, Female, Heart, Humans, Judgment, Male, Mental Recall, Students, Recognition, Psychology, Feedback, Physiological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review