Cited by 83Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlDeception detection and forensic psychology

Response inhibition on the stop signal task improves during cardiac contraction

Open access
Rae, Charlotte L., Botan, Vanessa E., Gould van Praag, Cassandra D., Herman, Aleksandra M., Nyyssönen, Jasmina A. K., Watson, David R., Duka, Theodora, Garfinkel, Sarah N. +1 more·2018·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motor actions can be facilitated or hindered by psychophysiological states of readiness, to guide rapid adaptive action. Cardiovascular arousal is communicated by cardiac signals conveying the timing and strength of individual heartbeats. Here, we tested how these interoceptive signals facilitate control of motor impulsivity. Participants performed a stop signal task, in which stop cues were delivered at different time points within the cardiac cycle: at systole when the heart contracts (T-wave peak, approximately 300 ms following the R-wave), or at diastole between heartbeats (R-wave peak). Response inhibition was better at systole, indexed by a shorter stop signal reaction time (SSRT), and longer stop signal delay (SSD). Furthermore, parasympathetic control of cardiovascular tone, and subjective sensitivity to interoceptive states, predicted response inhibition efficiency, although these cardiovascular and interoceptive correlations did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. This suggests that response inhibition capacity is influenced by interoceptive physiological cues, such that people are more likely to express impulsive actions during putative states of lower cardiovascular arousal, when frequency and strength of cardiac afferent signalling is reduced.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-27513-y

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rae, C. L., Botan, V. E., Gould van Praag, C. D., Herman, A. M., Nyyssönen, J. A. K., Watson, D. R., Duka, T., Garfinkel, S. N., & Critchley, H. D.
Affiliations
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Rae, Charlotte L.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-06-14
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
9136-9136
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2806024308
Cited by
83
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
response inhibition, stop-signal task, cardiac cycle, systole, diastole, cardiovascular arousal, interoception, impulsivity, parasympathetic modulation, stop-signal reaction time, stop-signal delay
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Arousal, Diastole, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Systole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review