Cited by 77Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A new look at memory retention and forgetting.

Radvansky, Gabriel A., Doolen, Abigail C., Pettijohn, Kyle A., Ritchey, Maureen·2022·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

The forgetting curve is one of the most well known and established findings in memory research. Knowing the pattern of memory change over time can provide insight into underlying cognitive mechanisms. The default understanding is that forgetting follows a continuous, negatively accelerating function, such as a power function. We show that this understanding is incorrect. We first consider whether forgetting rates vary across different intervals of time reported in the literature. We found that there were different patterns of forgetting across different time periods. Next, we consider evidence that complex memories, such as those derived from event cognition, show different patterns, such as linear forgetting. Based on these findings, we argue that forgetting cannot be adequately explained by a single continuous function. As an alternative, we propose a Memory Phases Framework, through which the progress of memory can be divided into phases that parallel changes associated with neurological memory consolidation. These phases include (a) Working Memory (WM) during the first minute of retention, (b) Early Long-Term Memory (e-LTM) during the 12 hr following encoding, (c) a period of Transitional Long-Term Memory (t-LTM) during the following week or so, and (d) Long-Lasting Memory (LLM) memory beyond this. These findings are of significance for any field of study where being able to predict retention and forgetting is important, such as training, eyewitness memory, or clinical treatment. They are also important for evaluating behavioral or neuroscientific manipulations targeting memories over longer periods of time when different processes may be involved. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/xlm0001110

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The temporal trajectories of spatial memory representations over extended periods may be more consistent with frameworks emphasizing distinct memory phases and processes.

    “Instead, the temporal trajectories of spatial memory representations over extended periods may be more consistent with frameworks emphasizing distinct memory phases and processes19.”

    From Long-term Memory Reorganization of Navigational Episodes (2026) · cites this paper as [19]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Radvansky, G. A., Doolen, A. C., Pettijohn, K. A., & Ritchey, M.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Published
2022-11
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
1698-1723
ISSN
  • 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1285
OpenAlex
W4210775358
Cited by
77
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
forgetting curve, memory retention, forgetting rate, memory consolidation, working memory, long-term memory, event cognition
MeSH terms
Cognition, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Memory, Long-Term

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review