The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification of cathode materials for lithium batteries guided by first-principles calculations
Open accessAbstract
Lithium batteries have the highest energy density of all rechargeable batteries and are favoured in applications where low weight or small volume are desired — for example, laptop computers, cellular telephones and electric vehicles. One of the limitations of present commercial lithium batteries is the high cost of the LiCoO2 cathode material. Searches for a replacement material that, like LiCoO2, intercalates lithium ions reversibly have covered most of the known lithium/transition-metal oxides, but the number of possible mixtures of these is almost limitless, making an empirical search labourious and expensive. Here we show that first-principles calculations can instead direct the search for possible cathode materials. Through such calculations we identify a large class of new candidate materials in which non-transition metals are substituted for transition metals. The replacement with non-transition metals is driven by the realization that oxygen, rather than transition-metal ions, function as the electron acceptor upon insertion of Li. For one such material, Li(Co,Al)O2, we predict and verify experimentally that aluminium substitution raises the cell voltage while decreasing both the density of the material and its cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Towards the computational design of solid catalysts
Nørskov, J. K., Bligaard, T., Rossmeisl, J., & Christensen, C. H. (2009) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.121 · Cited by 4,161
Computational high-throughput screening of electrocatalytic materials for hydrogen evolution
Greeley, J., Jaramillo, T. F., Bonde, J., Chorkendorff, I., & Nørskov, J. K. (2006) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1752 · Cited by 4,097
The high-throughput highway to computational materials design
Curtarolo, S., Hart, G. L. W., Nardelli, M. B., Mingo, N., Sanvito, S., & Levy, O. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3568 · Cited by 2,053
High-throughput electronic band structure calculations: Challenges and tools
Setyawan, W., & Curtarolo, S. (2010) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.010 · Cited by 1,692
Pseudopotentials for high-throughput DFT calculations
Garrity, K. F., Bennett, J. W., Rabe, K. M., & Vanderbilt, D. (2014) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.053 · Cited by 1,644
Metadata
- Authors
- Ceder, G., Chiang, Y.-M., Sadoway, D. R., Aydinol, M. K., Jang, Y.-I., & Huang, B.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 392
- Issue
- 6677
- Pages
- 694-696
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1854827278
- Cited by
- 841
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of cathode materials for lithium batteries guided by first-principles calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/33647
- The paper
- Ceder, G., Chiang, Y.-M., Sadoway, D. R., Aydinol, M. K., Jang, Y.-I., & Huang, B. (1998). Identification of cathode materials for lithium batteries guided by first-principles calculations. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/33647
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.