Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient
Abstract
Reading and writing require access to stored knowledge about the spelling of words. Presumably, we recognize chair but not chare or chiar as a word of English, and similarly would write 'chair' but not 'chare' or 'chiar', because we access orthographic representations that specify the identity and the order of the graphemes (abstract letter representations) that comprise the spelling of words. Thus, a fundamental problem concerns the content and structure of the hypothesized orthographic representations, and how information about grapheme order is represented and processed. We present evidence from a brain-damaged patient (N.G.) with unilateral neglect that this information is coded spatially. Unilateral neglect is a disorder clinically characterized by the inability to perceive or respond to stimuli presented to the side contralateral to the site of lesion, despite the absence of significant sensory or motor deficits. The patient made reading and spelling errors only on the right half of words, regardless of length. Furthermore, she produced the same pattern of errors in reading and spelling, irrespective of the topographic arrangement of stimuli in reading (horizontal, vertical or mirror-reversed words) and of the type of response in spelling (written, oral or backward oral spelling). This pattern of performance suggests that order information in orthographic representations is coded spatially in a word-centred coordinate system; that is, in a spatially defined coordinate f…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For location-invariant word recognition, the location-specific map must be transformed into a word-centered code that ties letter identity to within-word position independently of retinal location.
“However, for the purposes of location-invariant word recognition, this location-specific map must be transformed into a “word-centered” code such that letter identity is tied to within-word position (where a word is defined as a string of letters separated by spaces) independently of retinal location”
From A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011) · cites this paper as Caramazza and Hillis, 1990
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
The Border Between Seeing and Thinking
Block, N. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197622223.001.0001 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Fedorenko, E., & Varley, R. (2016) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13046 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
- Authors
- Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 1990-07
- Volume
- 346
- Issue
- 6281
- Pages
- 267-269
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2046981948
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 8.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- hemispatial neglect, orthographic representation, spatial coding, word reading, spelling
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Brain, Brain Damage, Chronic, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Perceptual Disorders, Reading
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review