Cited by 272Reading and Literacy DevelopmentSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric DysfunctionNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient

Caramazza, Alfonso, Hillis, Argye E.·1990·Nature

Abstract

Reading and writing require access to stored knowledge about the spelling of words. Presumably, we recognize chair but not chare or chiar as a word of English, and similarly would write 'chair' but not 'chare' or 'chiar', because we access orthographic representations that specify the identity and the order of the graphemes (abstract letter representations) that comprise the spelling of words. Thus, a fundamental problem concerns the content and structure of the hypothesized orthographic representations, and how information about grapheme order is represented and processed. We present evidence from a brain-damaged patient (N.G.) with unilateral neglect that this information is coded spatially. Unilateral neglect is a disorder clinically characterized by the inability to perceive or respond to stimuli presented to the side contralateral to the site of lesion, despite the absence of significant sensory or motor deficits. The patient made reading and spelling errors only on the right half of words, regardless of length. Furthermore, she produced the same pattern of errors in reading and spelling, irrespective of the topographic arrangement of stimuli in reading (horizontal, vertical or mirror-reversed words) and of the type of response in spelling (written, oral or backward oral spelling). This pattern of performance suggests that order information in orthographic representations is coded spatially in a word-centred coordinate system; that is, in a spatially defined coordinate f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/346267a0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For location-invariant word recognition, the location-specific map must be transformed into a word-centered code that ties letter identity to within-word position independently of retinal location.

    “However, for the purposes of location-invariant word recognition, this location-specific map must be transformed into a “word-centered” code such that letter identity is tied to within-word position (where a word is defined as a string of letters separated by spaces) independently of retinal location”

    From A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011) · cites this paper as Caramazza and Hillis, 1990

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
1990-07
Volume
346
Issue
6281
Pages
267-269
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2046981948
Cited by
272
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
hemispatial neglect, orthographic representation, spatial coding, word reading, spelling
MeSH terms
Aged, Brain, Brain Damage, Chronic, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Perceptual Disorders, Reading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review