Cited by 247Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismCategorization, perception, and languageHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Language and thought are not the same thing: evidence from neuroimaging and neurological patients: Language versus thought

Open access
Fedorenko, Evelina, Varley, Rosemary·2016·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Is thought possible without language? Individuals with global aphasia, who have almost no ability to understand or produce language, provide a powerful opportunity to find out. Surprisingly, despite their near-total loss of language, these individuals are nonetheless able to add and subtract, solve logic problems, think about another person's thoughts, appreciate music, and successfully navigate their environments. Further, neuroimaging studies show that healthy adults strongly engage the brain's language areas when they understand a sentence, but not when they perform other nonlinguistic tasks such as arithmetic, storing information in working memory, inhibiting prepotent responses, or listening to music. Together, these two complementary lines of evidence provide a clear answer: many aspects of thought engage distinct brain regions from, and do not depend on, language.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nyas.13046

Cites

289 of 289 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite nearly complete loss of linguistic abilities, individuals with severe aphasia can have intact non-linguistic cognitive abilities: they can play chess, solve arithmetic problems, leverage world knowledge, reason about cause and effect, and navigate complex social situations.

    “However, despite the nearly complete loss of linguistic abilities, individuals with severe aphasia can have intact non-linguistic cognitive abilities: they can play chess, solve arithmetic problems, leverage their world knowledge to perform diverse tasks, reason about cause and effect, and navigate complex social situations [49].”

    From Dissociating language and thought in large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [49]

  • The human language network is sensitive to abstract hierarchical rules across isolated phrases, naturalistic narratives, and syntactically well-formed but semantically empty stimuli.

    “it is sensitive to abstract hierarchical rules in isolated phrases and sentences [31, 108, 109, 110], in naturalistic narratives [111, 112, 113, 114], and in syntactically well-formed but semantically empty (”

    From Dissociating language and thought in large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [49]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [61]Norman-Haignere S Kanwisher N McDermott J Hypothesis-Free Decomposition of Voxel Responses to Natural Sounds Reveals Distinct Cortical Pathways for Music and Speech Neuron 2015 88 1281 96 26687225 PMC4740977
  2. [105]de Villiers J Baron-Cohen S Tager-Flusberg H Cohen D Understanding other minds: perspectives from autism and developmental cognitive neuroscience 2000 88 123 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, MA
  3. [145]Bernstein L The unanswered question 1976 Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
  4. [148]Lerdahl F Jackendoff R A generative grammar of tonal music 1983 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
  5. [187]Trainor LJ Zatorre R Hallam S Cross I Thaut M The neurobiological basis of musical expectations: from probabilities to emotional meaning 2009 171 183 Oxford University Press Oxford, UK
  6. [253]Bresnan J The Mental representation of grammatical relations 1982 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
  7. [261]Jackendoff R X-bar-Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure 1977 MIT Press Cambridge, MA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fedorenko, E., & Varley, R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Fedorenko, Evelina
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04
Volume
1369
Issue
1
Pages
132-153
ISSN
0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2341101865
Cited by
247
References
289
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NICHD Award (R00 HD-057522)
  • AHRC “Language in Mental Health” Award (AH/L004070/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
language and thought, global aphasia, arithmetic, working memory, inhibitory control, music perception, theory of mind, language areas, neuroimaging of language, neurological patients
MeSH terms
Aphasia, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Language, Thinking, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review