Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 752

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Information processing with population codes

Pouget, Alexandre, Dayan, Peter, Zemel, Richard·2000·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35039062

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Bair, W. Spike timing in the mammalian visual system. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 447–453 (1999). · DOI
  2. Borst, A. & Theunissen, F. E. Information theory and neural coding. Nature Neurosci. 2, 947– 957 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Usrey, W. & Reid, R. Synchronous activity in the visual system. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 61, 435– 456 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Tolhurst, D., Movshon, J. & Dean, A. The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex. Vision Res. 23, 775–785 (1982). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Földiak, P. in Computation and Neural Systems (eds Eeckman, F. & Bower, J.) 55–60 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, 1993). · DOI
  6. Salinas, E. & Abbot, L. Vector reconstruction from firing rate. J. Comput. Neurosci. 1, 89– 108 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Sanger, T. Probability density estimation for the interpretation of neural population codes. J. Neurophysiol. 76, 2790– 2793 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ferguson, T. Mathematical statistics: a decision theoretic approach (Academic, New York, 1967).
  9. Paradiso, M. A theory of the use of visual orientation information which exploits the columnar structure of striate cortex. Biol. Cybern. 58, 35–49 (1988).A pioneering study of the statistical properties of population codes, including the first use of Bayesian techniques to read out and analyse population codes. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Seung, H. & Sompolinsky, H. Simple model for reading neuronal population codes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 10749–10753 (1993). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Deneve, S., Latham, P. & Pouget, A. Reading population codes: A neural implementation of ideal observers. Nature Neurosci. 2, 740 –745 (1999).Shows how a recurrent network of units with bell-shaped tuning curves can be wired to implement a close approximation to a maximum likelihood estimator. Maximum likelihood estimation is widely used in psychophysics to analyse human performance in simple perceptual tasks in a class of model known as `ideal observer analysis'. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Georgopoulos, A., Kalaska, J. & Caminiti, R. On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 2, 1527–1537 ( 1982). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Pouget, A., Deneve, S., Ducom, J. & Latham, P. Narrow vs wide tuning curves: what's best for a population code? Neural Comput. 11, 85–90 ( 1999). · DOI
  14. Pouget, A. & Thorpe, S. Connectionist model of orientation identification. Connect. Sci. 3, 127– 142 (1991). · DOI
  15. Regan, D. & Beverley, K. Postadaptation orientation discrimination . J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 147– 155 (1985). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Zhang, K. Representation of spatial orientation by the intrinsic dynamics of the head-direction cell ensemble: a theory. J. Neurosci. 16, 2112–2126 (1996). Head direction cells in rats encode the heading direction of the rat in world-centred coordinates. This internal compass is calibrated with sensory cues, maintained in the absence of these cues and updated after each movement of the head. This model shows how attractor networks of neurons with bell-shaped tuning curves to head direction can be wired to account for these properties. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Poggio, T. A theory of how the brain might work. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 55, 899–910 (1990).Introduces the idea that many computations in the brain can be formalized in terms of nonlinear mappings, and as such can be solved with population codes computing basis functions. Although completely living up to the title would be a tall order, this remains a most interesting proposal. A wide range of available neurophysiological data can be easily understood within this framework. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Pouget, A. & Sejnowski, T. Spatial transformations in the parietal cortex using basis functions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9, 222–237 (1997). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Andersen, R., Essick, G. & Siegel, R. Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons . Science 230, 456–458 (1985). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Squatrito, S. & Maioli, M. Gaze field properties of eye position neurons in areas MST and 7a of macaque monkey. Visual Neurosci. 13, 385–398 ( 1996). · DOI
  21. Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G. & Williams, R. in Parallel Distributed Processing (eds Rumelhart, D., McClelland, J. & Group, P. R.) 318–362 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1986). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Zipser, D. & Andersen, R. A back-propagation programmed network that stimulates reponse properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons . Nature 331, 679–684 (1988). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Burnod, Y. et al. Visuomotor transformations underlying arm movements toward visual targets: a neural network model of cerebral cortical operations. J. Neurosci. 12, 1435–1453 (1992).A model of the coordinate transformation required for arm movements using a representation very similar to basis functions. This model was one of the first to relate the tuning properties of cells in the primary motor cortex to their computational role. In particular, it explains why cells in M1 change their preferred direction to hand movement with starting hand position. · DOI
  24. Salinas, E. & Abbot, L. Transfer of coded information from sensory to motor networks. J. Neurosci. 15, 6461–6474 (1995). A model showing how a basis function representation can be used to learn visuomotor transformations with a simple hebbian learning rule. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Bishop, C., Svenson, M. & Williams, C. GTM: The generative topographic mapping. Neural Comput. 10, 215–234 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Lewicki, M. & Sejnowski, T. Learning overcomplete representations . Neural Comput. 12, 337– 365 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hinton, G. E. in Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks 1–6 (IEEE, London, England, 1999).
  28. Poggio, T. & Edelman, S. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature 343, 263 –266 (1990). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Salinas, E. & Abbott, L. Invariant visual responses from attentional gain fields. J. Neurophysiol. 77, 3267– 3272 (1997). · DOI
  30. Deneve, S. & Pouget, A. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Jordan, M., Kearns, M. & Solla, S.) (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1998).
  31. Groh, J. & Sparks, D. Two models for transforming auditory signals from head-centered to eye-centered coordinates. Biol. Cybern. 67, 291–302 ( 1992). · DOI
  32. Pouget, A. & Sejnowski, T. A neural model of the cortical representation of egocentric distance. Cereb. Cortex 4, 314–329 (1994). · DOI
  33. Olshausen, B., Anderson, C. & Essen, D. V. A multiscale dynamic routing circuit for forming size- and position-invariant object representations. J. Comput. Neurosci. 2, 45–62 ( 1995). · DOI
  34. Treue, S., Hol, K. & Rauber, H. Seeing multiple directions of motion-physiology and psychophysics. Nature Neurosci. 3, 270–276 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Shadlen, M., Britten, K., Newsome, W. & Movshon, T. A computational analysis of the relationship between neuronal and behavioral responses to visual motion. J. Neurosci. 16, 1486– 1510 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Zemel, R. & Dayan, P. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 11 (eds Kearns, M., Solla, S. & Cohn, D.) 174–180 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999).
  37. Simoncelli, E., Adelson, E. & Heeger, D. in Proceedings 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 310– 315 (Los Alamitos, Los Angeles, 1991). · DOI · Paper page
  38. Watamaniuk, S., Sekuler, R. & Williams, D. Direction perception in complex dynamic displays: the integration of direction information. Vision Res. 29 , 47–59 (1989). · DOI · Paper page
  39. Anderson, C. in Computational Intelligence Imitating Life 213– 222 (IEEE Press, New York, 1994).Neurons are frequently suggested to encode single values (or at most 2–3 values for cases such as transparency). Anderson challenges this idea and argues that population codes might encode probability distributions instead. Being able to encode a probability distribution is important because it would allow the brain to perform Bayesian inference, an efficient way to compute in the face of uncertainty.
  40. Recanzone, G., Wurtz, R. & Schwarz, U. Responses of MT and MST neurons to one and two moving objects in the receptive field. J. Neurophysiol. 78 , 2904–2915 (1997). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Wezel, R. V., Lankheet, M., Verstraten, F., Maree, A. & Grind, W. V. D. Responses of complex cells in area 17 of the cat to bi-vectorial transparent motion. Vision Res. 36, 2805–2813 ( 1996). · DOI
  42. Perrett, D., Mistlin, A. & Chitty, A. Visual neurons responsive to faces. Trends Neurosci. 10, 358–364 ( 1987). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Bruce, V., Cowey, A., Ellis, A. & Perret, D. Processing the Facial Image (Clarendon, Oxford, 1992). · DOI

Cited by

See all 752

Metadata

Authors
Pouget, A., Dayan, P., & Zemel, R.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2000-11
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
125-132
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W1503602982
Cited by
752
References
6
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information processing with population codes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/35039062
The paper
Pouget, A., Dayan, P., & Zemel, R. (2000). Information processing with population codes. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/35039062

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.