Cited by 143Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision

Hess, Robert F., Dakin, Steven C.·1997·Nature

Abstract

Human foveal vision is subserved initially by groups of spatial, temporal and orientational 'filters', the outputs of which are combined to define perceptual objects. Although a great deal is known about the filtering properties of individual cortical cells, relatively little is known about the nature of this 'linking' process. One recent approach has shown that the process can be thought of in terms of an association field whose strength is determined conjointly by the orientation and distance of the object. Here we describe a fundamental difference in this feature-linking process in central and peripheral parts of the visual field, which provides insight into the ways that foveal and peripheral visual perception differ. In the fovea, performance can be explained only by intercellular linking operations whereas in the periphery intracellular filtering will suffice. This difference represents a substantial economy in cortical neuronal processing of peripheral visual information and may allow a recent theory of intercellular binding to be tested.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/37593

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Embedded contours constructed from Gabor elements cannot be detected by purely local feature detectors or by the known types of orientation-tuned neurons with large receptive fields.

    “Embedded contours constructed from such elements cannot be detected by purely local feature detectors or by the known types of orientation-tuned neurons with large receptive fields (e.g., 64); their detection requires the integration of local orientation measurements (Figure 6).”

    From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [64]

  • Detection of embedded contours requires the integration of local orientation measurements.

    “Embedded contours constructed from such elements cannot be detected by purely local feature detectors or by the known types of orientation-tuned neurons with large receptive fields (e.g., 64); their detection requires the integration of local orientation measurements (Figure 6).”

    From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [64]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hess, R. F., & Dakin, S. C.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Hess, Robert F.
Venue
Nature
Published
1997-12-01
Volume
390
Issue
6660
Pages
602-604
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1663667774
Cited by
143
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
feature linking, peripheral vision, foveal vision, association fields, object perception, retinal eccentricity
MeSH terms
Form Perception, Fovea Centralis, Humans, Psychophysics, Visual Fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review