Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum teleportation across the Danube

Ursin, Rupert, Jennewein, Thomas, Aspelmeyer, Markus, Kaltenbaek, Rainer, Lindenthal, Michael, Walther, Philip, Zeilinger, Anton·2004·Nature

Abstract

Efficient long-distance quantum teleportation is crucial for quantum communication and quantum networking schemes. Here we describe the high-fidelity teleportation of photons over a distance of 600 metres across the River Danube in Vienna, with the optimal efficiency that can be achieved using linear optics. Our result is a step towards the implementation of a quantum repeater, which will enable pure entanglement to be shared between distant parties in a public environment and eventually on a worldwide scale.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/430849a

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The process of transferring a qubit state from one photon to another is the core of future long-distance quantum communication as envisaged today.

    “Though the sources of single photons and photon pairs are still spatially close, the process is indeed the core of future long-distance quantum communication as we envisage it today (see Section 2.2) [320,361].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [361]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bose, S., Vedral, V. & Knight, P. L. Phys. Rev. A 57, 822–829 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Lütkenhaus, N., Calsamiglia, J. & Suominen, K. -A. Phys. Rev. A 59, 3295–3300 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Kim, Y. -H. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1370–1373 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Popescu, S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 797–799 (1994). · DOI
  5. Marcikic, I., de Riedmatten, H., Tittel, W., Zbinden, H. & Gisin, N. Nature 421, 509–513 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Riebe, M. et al. Nature 429, 734–737 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Barrett, M. D. et al. Nature 429, 737–739 (2004). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ursin, R., Jennewein, T., Aspelmeyer, M., Kaltenbaek, R., Lindenthal, M., Walther, P., & Zeilinger, A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2004-08-18
Volume
430
Issue
7002
Pages
849-849
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
Cited by
286
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review