Cited by 749Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Multiparticle generalization of entanglement swapping

Open access
Bose, S., Vedral, V., Knight, P. L.·1998·Physical Review A

Abstract

We generalize the procedure of entanglement swapping to obtain a scheme for manipulating entanglement in multiparticle systems. We describe how this scheme allows one to establish multiparticle entanglement between particles belonging to distant users in a communication network through a prior distribution of singlets followed by only local measurements. We show that this scheme can be regarded as a method of generating entangled states of many particles and compare it with existing schemes using simple quantum computational networks. We highlight the practical advantages of using a series of entanglement swappings during the distribution of entangled particles between two parties. Applications of multiparticle entangled states in cryptographic conferencing and in reading messages from more than one source through a single measurement are also described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.57.822

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Once one is able to entangle two photons that never interacted, one can construct very many types of entanglement, which in turn can be utilized in many ways.

    “Once one is able to entangle two photons that never interacted, one can construct very many types of entanglement (Zeilinger et al., 1997), which in turn can be utilized in many ways (Bose et al., 1998).”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Bose et al., 1998

  • When particle 1 is a member of an entangled pair, the teleportation leads to entanglement swapping.

    “This is the case when, as already remarked by Bennett et al. (1993), particle 1 itself is a member of an entangled pair, ultimately leading to entanglement swapping ( Żukowski et al., 1993;Bose et al., 1998).”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Bose et al., 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bose, S., Vedral, V., & Knight, P. L.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1998-02-01
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
822-829
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W1995369574
Cited by
749
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 33
FWCI
30.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
entanglement swapping, multipartite entanglement, entanglement distribution, singlet state, local measurements, quantum networks, entanglement generation, quantum cryptography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review