Cited by 554Economic Growth and ProductivityCognitive Abilities and TestingCulture, Economy, and Development Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The mental wealth of nations

Open access

Abstract

Countries must learn how to capitalize on their citizens' cognitive resources if they are to prosper, both economically and socially. Early interventions will be key.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/4551057a

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 16 references

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Llewellyn, D. J., Lang, I. A., Langa, K. M., McWilliams, B. C. & Huppert, F. A. Age Ageing (in the press).
  2. Goswami, U. Foresight Mental Capital and Wellbeing Project. Learning Difficulties: Future Challenges (Government Office for Science, 2008).
  3. Bebbington, P. E. et al. Br. J. Psychiatr. (in the press).
  4. Challen, A., King, D., Knapp, M. & McNally, S. Foresight Mental Capital and Wellbeing Project. The Economic Consequences of Specific Learning Difficulties and the Cost-Effectiveness of Prevention Strategies (Government Office for Science, 2008).
  5. Knapp, M. et al. Dementia UK (Alzheimer's Society, 2007).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 552

Metadata

Authors
Beddington, J., Cooper, C. L., Field, J., Goswami, U., Huppert, F. A., Jenkins, R., Jones, H. S., Kirkwood, T. B. L., Sahakian, B. J., & Thomas, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Government of the United Kingdom (GB)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Venue
Nature
Published
2008-10-22
Volume
455
Issue
7216
Pages
1057-1060
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2094055797
Cited by
554
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 28
FWCI
75.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (G0001354, G0400574)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/C008200/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Development › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
Keywords
cognitive resources, cognitive capital, national prosperity, early intervention, cognitive development, economic development, social development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Development, Depression, United Kingdom, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Mental Health, Risk Factors, Work, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review