Cited by 55CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBiomedical Ethics and RegulationEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Embryo editing sparks epic debate

Cyranoski, David, Reardon, Sara·2015·Nature

Abstract

In wake of paper describing genetic modification of human embryos, scientists disagree about ethics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/520593a

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cyranoski, D., & Reardon, S.
Venue
Nature
Published
2015-04-29
Volume
520
Issue
7549
Pages
593-594
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2000938956
Cited by
55
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, bioethics, scientific controversy, embryo research ethics
MeSH terms
Animals, China, Embryo, Mammalian, Genetic Engineering, Humans, Embryo Research, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review