Cited by 2,263Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast

Abbott, L. F., Nelson, Sacha B.·2000·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Synaptic plasticity provides the basis for most models of learning, memory and development in neural circuits. To generate realistic results, synapse-specific Hebbian forms of plasticity, such as long-term potentiation and depression, must be augmented by global processes that regulate overall levels of neuronal and network activity. Regulatory processes are often as important as the more intensively studied Hebbian processes in determining the consequences of synaptic plasticity for network function. Recent experimental results suggest several novel mechanisms for regulating levels of activity in conjunction with Hebbian synaptic modification. We review three of them-synaptic scaling, spike-timing dependent plasticity and synaptic redistribution-and discuss their functional implications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/81453

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 51 references

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Minai, A. A. & Levy, W. B. Sequence learning in a single trial . INNS World Congress of Neural Networks II, 505–508 (1993).
  2. Van Rossum, M. C., Bi, B. & Turrigiano, G. G. Learning rules that generate stable synaptic weight distributions. J. Neurosci. (in press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 999

Metadata

Authors
Abbott, L. F., & Nelson, S. B.
Affiliations
Brandeis University (US)
Corresponding author
Abbott, L. F.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2000-11
Volume
3
Issue
S11
Pages
1178-1183
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1489333352
Cited by
2,263
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 87 · 2025: 129 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 121 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 86
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ey011116-07)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH058754, MH58754)
  • National Eye Institute (EY11116)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
synaptic plasticity, Hebbian plasticity, long-term potentiation, long-term depression, synaptic scaling, spike-timing-dependent plasticity, learning and memory, neural development
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Synapses, Receptors, Glutamate, Long-Term Potentiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review