Cited by 1,690Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Synaptic depression and cortical gain control

Abbott, L. F., Varela, J. A., Sen, Kamal, Nelson, S. B.·1997·Science

Abstract

Cortical neurons receive synaptic inputs from thousands of afferents that fire action potentials at rates ranging from less than 1 hertz to more than 200 hertz. Both the number of afferents and their large dynamic range can mask changes in the spatial and temporal pattern of synaptic activity, limiting the ability of a cortical neuron to respond to its inputs. Modeling work based on experimental measurements indicates that short-term depression of intracortical synapses provides a dynamic gain-control mechanism that allows equal percentage rate changes on rapidly and slowly firing afferents to produce equal postsynaptic responses. Unlike inhibitory and adaptive mechanisms that reduce responsiveness to all inputs, synaptic depression is input-specific, leading to a dramatic increase in the sensitivity of a neuron to subtle changes in the firing patterns of its afferents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.275.5297.221

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rescaling of prediction errors by recurrent connections, in proportion to their precision, affords a form of cortical bias or gain control.

    “The rescaling of prediction errors by recurrent connections, in proportion to their precision, affords a form of cortical bias or gain control [73],[74].”

    From Hierarchical Models in the Brain (2008) · cites this paper as [74]

  • In a perceptual setting, conditional precisions may mediate attentional gain.

    “In a perceptual setting, they may mediate attentional gain (cf., Abbott et al. 1997;Yu and Dayan 2005;Friston 2008).”

    From Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation (2010) · cites this paper as Abbott et al. 1997

  • Cortical bias or gain control is mediated by intrinsic inhibitory connections within cortical sources, which rescale prediction errors in proportion to their precision, so that as precision increases intrinsic recurrent inhibition decreases.

    “Cortical bias or gain control is mediated by intrinsic inhibitory connections within cortical sources, which rescale prediction errors, in proportion to their precision, so that as precision increases intrinsic recurrent inhibition decreases (Abbott et al., 1997, Friston, 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abbott, L. F., Varela, J. A., Sen, K., & Nelson, S. B.
Affiliations
Brandeis University (US)
Corresponding author
Abbott, L. F.
Venue
Science
Published
1997-01-10
Volume
275
Issue
5297
Pages
221-224
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2022995207
Cited by
1,690
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 58
FWCI
29.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
synaptic depression, short-term depression, postsynaptic response, cortical neurons, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Electric Stimulation, Models, Neurological, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Neurons, Afferent, Synapses, Visual Cortex, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review