Cited by 412Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

First-line gefitinib in Caucasian EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients: a phase-IV, open-label, single-arm study

Open access
Douillard, J-Y, Ostoros, G, Cobo, M, Ciuleanu, T, McCormack, R, Webster, A, Milenkova, T·2014·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phase-IV, open-label, single-arm study (NCT01203917) to assess efficacy and safety/tolerability of first-line gefitinib in Caucasian patients with stage IIIA/B/IV, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). TREATMENT: gefitinib 250 mg day(-1) until progression. Primary endpoint: objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints: disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety/tolerability. Pre-planned exploratory objective: EGFR mutation analysis in matched tumour and plasma samples. RESULTS: Of 1060 screened patients with NSCLC (859 known mutation status; 118 positive, mutation frequency 14%), 106 with EGFR sensitising mutations were enrolled (female 70.8%; adenocarcinoma 97.2%; never-smoker 64.2%). At data cutoff: ORR 69.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 60.5-77.7), DCR 90.6% (95% CI 83.5-94.8), median PFS 9.7 months (95% CI 8.5-11.0), median OS 19.2 months (95% CI 17.0-NC; 27% maturity). Most common adverse events (AEs; any grade): rash (44.9%), diarrhoea (30.8%); CTC (Common Toxicity Criteria) grade 3/4 AEs: 15%; SAEs: 19%. Baseline plasma 1 samples were available in 803 patients (784 known mutation status; 82 positive; mutation frequency 10%). Plasma 1 EGFR mutation test sensitivity: 65.7% (95% CI 55.8-74.7). CONCLUSION: First-line gefitinib was effective and well tolerated in Caucasian patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Plasma samples could be considered for mutation analysis if tumour tissue is unavailable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.2013.721

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liquid biopsy is a validated alternative to tissue rebiopsy, provides a surrogate source of DNA, and is a new strategy for tumour genotyping mainly at progression in EGFR-mutated patients.

    “A valid alternative to tissue rebiopsy is represented by liquid biopsy, which has been validated [126], represents a surrogate source of DNA and is a new strategy for tumour genotyping, mainly at the time of progression for EGFR-mutated patients [III, A] [127-129].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Douillard, J.-Y., Ostoros, G., Cobo, M., Ciuleanu, T., McCormack, R., Webster, A., & Milenkova, T.
Affiliations
  • Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (FR)
  • Országos Korányi Tbc és Pulmonológiai Intézet (HU)
  • Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga (ES)
  • Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Douillard, J-Y
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2013-11-21
Volume
110
Issue
1
Pages
55-62
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W1988827171
Cited by
412
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 6
FWCI
21.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RISalud Institutional Health Repository of Andalucía (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
gefitinib, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, first-line therapy, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse events, Caucasian patients
MeSH terms
Gefitinib, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Prospective Studies, Quinazolines, Disease Progression, Disease-Free Survival, Genes, erbB-1, White People, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Young Adult, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review