Cited by 15Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysNF-κB Signaling PathwaysAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

All roads lead to ubiquitin

Open access
Gyrd-Hansen, Mads·2017·Cell Death & Differentiation

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/cdd.2017.93

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Major negative regulators of necrosome include STUB1, A20, PPM1B, and AURKA.

    “Major negative regulators of the necrosome include: (1) STIP1 homology and U-box containing protein 1 (STUB1; also known as CHIP), which promotes RIPK1 and RIPK3 ubiquitination followed by lysosomal degradation [472, 473]; (2) A20, which inhibits necrosome assembly by deubiquitinating RIPK3 [473, 474]; (3) protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent 1B (PPM1B), which prevents MLKL recruitment to the”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Kulathu Y, Komander D. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012; 13: 508-523.
  2. Yau R, Rape M. Nat Cell Biol 2016; 18: 579-586.
  3. Cohen P, Strickson S. Cell Death Differ 2017; 24: 1153-1159.
  4. Fiil BK, Gyrd-Hansen M. FEBS J 2014; 281: 4337-4350.
  5. Sasaki K, Iwai K. Immunol Rev 2015; 266: 175-189.
  6. Harhaj EW, Dixit VM. Immunol Rev 2012; 246: 107-124.
  7. Shimizu Y, Taraborrelli L, Walczak H. Immunol Rev 2015; 266: 190-207.
  8. Feltham R, Silke J. Cell Death Differ 2017; 24: 1196-1204.
  9. Grootjans S, Vanden Berghe T, Vandenabeele P. Cell Death Differ 2017; 24: 1184-1195.
  10. Witt A, Vucic D. Cell Death Differ 2017; 24: 1160-1171.
  11. Jaworski M, Thome M. Cell Mol Life Sci 2016; 73: 459-473.
  12. Lork M, Verhelst K, Beyaert R. Cell Death Differ 2017; 24: 1172-1183.
  13. Popovic D, Vucic D, Dikic I. Nat Med 2014; 20: 1242-1253.
  14. Schlicher L et al. Cell Death Differ 2017; 24: 1142-1147.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gyrd-Hansen, M.
Venue
Cell Death & Differentiation
Published
2017-06-26
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
1135-1136
ISSN
  • 1350-9047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5403
OpenAlex
W2630047952
Cited by
15
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Death and Differentiation (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  • Wellcome Trust (102894/Z/13/Z)
  • Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
ubiquitination, ubiquitin, post-translational modification, polyubiquitin chains, lysine conjugation, ubiquitin system, cell death, inflammatory signalling, pathogen defense, genome stability
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Inflammation, Models, Biological, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Signal Transduction, Ubiquitin, Ubiquitination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review